outcome of the ninth circuit as a play of politics? >> remember, donald trump is not an attorney, so he's not an officer of the court. he's entitled to express his opinion about whether he thinks judges are impartial or doing their job or properly looking at the issue from all sides. and whether that's actually a good strategy is, of course, another matter. as someone like myself being an officer of the court, criticizing the objectivity of judges is not a good litigation strategy. nevertheless, you have to take a look at the fact that the judges spent a lot of time on the procedural matters of standing and whether or not this is something reviewable by the court. if you listen to the questioning, judge clifton, the republican appointee, is going to probably want to overturn it. freeland is going to want to up hold it. this is speculative and dangerous. the carter appointee looked like he would probably want to dial