calculus. >> as a pr prosecutor toentsen don't you make appropriatings you may not personally believe in doept you argue cases you may not think you can win but you think there is technically a legal basis for you to make those arguments. >> sabtly anderson. and people routinely do that. that is the burden and the honor of being on behalf of the united states of america high pressure. however you don't make arguments you not only personally disagree but the constitution actually says is not a good argument to make. remember at the time that first travel ban did include references to aspects that were violates of the constitution of the the second one i agree with jeffrey it's a harder case to not defend because that's a different travel ban a little bit more neutral facially. >> laura coats ken, jeff as well. president trump's son-in-law and senior jared kushner is facing heat over what his sister told chinese investors did she cross an ethical line?