it wouldn't take away the president's ability to defend the country." again, this is what i'm talking about, authorization of use of military force, duty to declare war. i know people are starting to go to sleep. but that kind of matters. it is what is motivating it, john. if he is going to talk this way, if he acts on such caprice, should he be allowed to have just his finger on the button? i know there is an argument about how the law works presently. but the "new york times" saying this is not just sour grapes. >> it is not. they will dismiss it simply because it is the new york tiles. here is one of the silver linings with donald trump. democrats are all of a sudden starting to fall in love with principal repbublicans in the past. things that formerly rand paul may have been howling in the