live from outside the supreme court. so jessica, what message in reading these opinions do they send on the question and gerrym? >> people wanted a broader issue here, but they wanted these maps drawn with intentional legal purposes. the supreme court not measuring on the issue, really relying on procedural grounds to let these maps stand, at least for now. they may be in place if other court rulings happen. the supreme court, interestingly, they didn't rule on this broader constitutional issue as to whether or not partisan gerrymandering is constitutional. they left that question open. but this was a unanimous decision to let these maps stand. however, at least one justice really signalled here that this issue could once again come before the supreme court if the facts of the case are right, and