day, et cetera, because she's already out there talking. her book is out there saying so much she can't sigh lens what's out there. >> the attack is symbolic. if you separate the two different ndas, one would have been signed as an employee of the west wing and one she would have signed as a member of the campaign. when she was a member of the campaign she was a private citizen contracting with a private entity. you don't have the same guarantees you won't have a court of law uphold the nda because you can privately contract away your rights to say what you're otherwise entitled to say in the private sector. but when it comes to the federal government, poppy, you cannot privately contract away your first amendment rights. you still have whistle-blower protection, you still have the obligation as a federal employee, as somebody with who is a public servant to speak about wrongs that you see, even if it means it has to criticize your employer however if you