something as as significant as in britney spears' case of significant assets so that i can manage them, so that i can see them and so that i can be the responsible person who's looking out for their interest. at some point if you're fortunate enough, the individual doesn't have the malady or substance abuse problem and you'll come to court and you'll likely get evaluated and no one else has to fend in your interest but you. and i think that's the argument she's making, whether a court will allow or permit moving forward for her to have exclusive control, i think that will be a subject of other tests that she has to undergo. but if she is fit and otherwise able and responsible, you know what, free will, she should be able to do what she needs to do when she wants to do it. >> well, and that's just it. it seems so unusual to me the idea of somebody who is really successful in the entertainment field, especially who has exhibited issues with substances or has acted erratically.