concerns. republican or democrat, doesn't make a difference. >> shepard: on the matter of policy that the supreme court did not delve into that area to you is perfectly on point or something else? >> that they didn't delve into the -- >> shepard: the policy. >> absolutely. once you start to do that, you're down a slippery slope. what the chief justi said is so long as there's a rationale basis. this is a legal term. if the presidential authority is solid in the law, even if there's a discriminatory intent to the law, if you can find a rationale basis for it, i.e. national security, it's okay. he listed a number of things with the president and the administration tried to tailor and limit. it's 8% of the muslim countries. countries that i can tell you as a homeland security person that don't have proper vetting processes that represent a danger to the community. from previous administrations, congress itself, intelligence security people said that represent adanger. so as you can see, shepard, and i find interesting what the supreme court did as well a couple of countries taken off