inquiry to there is no criminal inquiry. the times changes the headline, the lead, they publish not one but two corrections. over the weekend, the "new york times" public editor, the reader's advocate at the paper weighed in. "a clinton story fraught with inaccuracies." and then after that, today we get this editor's note about how the paper got a bunch of stuff wrong. how they mishandled even the corrections and still don't now how it all happened. this was a big high-profile disaster for the "new york times." it was also a reminder of the utterly bizarre relationship that the national media has with hillary clinton specifically. basically in the national media, everything hillary clinton does is a scan d.a. remember when she was super guilty in white water. she is covered as if a convicted felon who has to prove her innocence every time she is accused of something. even then she is still guilty. just got away with it. that is the attitude of the press corps with hillary clinton