Further Evaluation of the Arguments Raised in the Recent Nor

In this fourth of a series of columns, Illinois Law dean Vikram David Amar continues his discussion of the so-called Independent State Legislature (ISL) theory regarding federal congressional and presidential selection processes. Dean Amar responds to arguments the North Carolina Applicants raise in their Reply filed with the U.S. Supreme Court last week.

Related Keywords

Arizona , United States , North Carolina , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , Colorado , Delaware , Florida , Michigan , American , John Marshall , John Hoge , Hayward Smith , William Findley , Akhil Amar , George Washington , Arizona Elected Legislature , Us Court , Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission , Philadelphia Convention , Supreme Court , Rucho Court , Authority Of The United States , Us Supreme Court , Supreme Court Review , Florida Supreme Court , Florida Constitution League , Carolina Supreme Court , Independent Redistricting Commission , North Carolina Applicants , North Carolina Applicant , Supremacy Clause , Can We Learn , State Constitutional Adoptions , Amendments Shortly After , Federal Constitution Was , Chief Justice , Florida Constitution , Fair Districts Amendment , Women Voters , Redistricting Act , North Carolina Supreme , Florida Detzner , Applicant Reply , Eighth Circuit , Part Three ,