> i'm skeptical, i think this is a chance for mark zuckerberg to turn it into one of the world's best news sites. but if you're "the new york times" or a lesser publication Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies.">
> i'm skeptical, i think this is a chance for mark zuckerberg to turn it into one of the world's best news sites. but if you're "the new york times" or a lesser publication Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies." property="og:description">
> i'm skeptical, i think this is a chance for mark zuckerberg to turn it into one of the world's best news sites. but if you're "the new york times" or a lesser publication Get Live News Updates Every Minute from vimarsana.com Curated from 23000 News Agencies.">
outlets and facebook really really tripped over themselves to make it look like none of those doomsday scenarios were coming true. so on the facebook side they gave up huge concessions to the media publishers to look like hey, we're just trying to get more people to read your stuff at a quicker load time. nothing else nothing to see here. and on the publisher side they wanted their readers to know that they weren't all going to be quizzes. "the new york times,"",,"",," "national geographic," all of these publications put out very long cabal "j" journalism pieces with the exception of buzz feed to say, look we haven't changed at all. but what everyone knows watching this we've got to look a lot longer than a weak to see if all of the fears of all of these agreements is really going to come true. >> i'm skeptical, i think this is a chance for mark zuckerberg to turn it into one of the world's best news sites. but if you're "the new york times" or a lesser publication