Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com
ticketed him for camping on public property. the story would've ended there except a huge corporate law fir in new york city took an interest and the case on the other side of the country. typically, their wall street banks and prominent democratic officeholders for the firm wanted to change the vagrancy laws to increase homelessness. why did they want that? we don't know. they filed a lawsuit against th city of boise. that suit mated to the ninth circuit court of appeals in 201 the court declared that cities have no right to criminalize homelessness. in fact, the court ruled cities have an obligation to provide free housing to the homeless at the public expense. the supreme court later upheld the ruling card it was known as martin versus boise and it had exactly the effect intended. the city officials across the country no longer had an obligation to protect the publi and public spaces from drug addicts who decided to live in them. at the same time, politician suddenly had access to a massiv