Biggest News aggregator with 200 million news articles | vimarsana.com

saying the justice of the state supreme court in manhattan said the case was simple. the school was not a religious corporation. she cited two amendments of 1967 that the credit to be an educational corporation under the education law of the state of new york that was "organized and operated exclusively for educational purposes." how does the university now go to the supreme court and say it's an issue of religious freedom? >> this is a releasable case. it's a question of who gets to decide. does america's leading jewish institution get to decide whether to have a pride alliance club or jews for jesus club? or can the government tell them what to do. telling what kind of clubs to have on the campus. religious freedom protects the

Related Keywords

Case , Justice , Corporation , School , Of The State Supreme Court , Amendments , In Manhattan , 1967 , Two , Yeshiva University , Issue , State , U S Supreme Court , New York City , Education Law , Credit , Purposes , America , Question , Jews For Jesus , Freedom , Institution , Pride Alliance Club , Jewish , Releasable , Government , Kind , Campus , Clubs , Telling ,