perspectives, morals and even prejudices. but the law requires them to come together and weigh the facts of the case and then decide someone's guilt or innocence. what's it like deliberating a case that could lead to the death penalty for the accused. i'm joined by three members of the jury who in 2004 convicted scott peterson of murdering his pregnant wife lacy and unborn child connor. and joining us here today, they were on the scott peterson trial. michelle again with you. talk about the stress that the jury members experienced in the process of going through, in your case, a very high profile, highly televised trial similar to the casey anthony case? >> it was difficult, number one, i was an alternate at first, so you listen to all the information and at the end you're not able to do anything with it so that's frustrating and then i was put in as a juror and we had to start the