indictment, there is probably decisions that had to be made on things that couldn't be charged. and we've spent the greater part of the last two years or so debating the question of whether the former president will be charged with things like seditious conspiracy or inciting violence and so on. i think it would have been incredibly hard to tie the president to some of those things. for instance, seditious conspiracy, you'd have to prove some agreement to use force or threats to prevent, hinder or delay the execution of american law. now that happened, and many people were already convicted of it. but tying the president to that would have been incredibly difficult. and you would have also run into some pretty serious first amendment. >> explicit versus implicit. >> and all of those things from his speech which were disgraceful, shameful for a president, unbecoming, not becoming the presidency. so it would have been incredibly difficult to do. and then the other thing -- that's what's not in the