Panel Discusses Supreme Court Case Threatening End of Affirm

On Oct. 31, SCOTUS listened to oral arguments in two cases challenging race-conscious student admissions policies used by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina (UNC) to promote creating diverse student populations at their schools. The case emerged in 2014, when SFFA, a nonprofit advocacy organization opposed to affirmative action, brought an action alleging Harvard violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act (Title VI). By Antonio Ray Harvey | California Black Media A webinar hosted by ChangeLawyers, the American Constitution Society (ACS) Bay Area, and Equal Justice Society was held Nov. 15 to discuss the possible outcomes of the pending decision by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the case of Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA)

Related Keywords

China , California , United States , Oakland , Michigan , Chinese , Americans , American , Lyndonb Johnson , Sally Chen , Antonio Ray Harvey , Gavin Newsom , Sarahc Zearfoss , Assemblymember Shirley Weber , Shirley Weber , Shilpa Ram , University Of Michigan Law School , Students For Fair Admissions Inc , University Of Michigan Law School Jurist Doctorate , University Of North Carolina , American Constitution Society , California Task Force To Study , Supreme Court , Justice Society , Harvard University , Office Of Financial Aid , Harvard College , California Black , Bay Area , Equal Justice Society , Fair Admissions , Affirmative Action , Coming After , Lisa Holder , Ending Affirmative Action , California Task Force , Develop Reparation Proposals , African Americans , Assembly Bill , Assemblymember Shirley , Michigan Law , Education Equity , Public Advocates , Area Lawyer Chapter , North Carolina , Civil Rights Act , Asian American , Equal Protection Clause , President Lyndon , Executive Order , Michigan Law School Jurist Doctorate ,