The U.N. Cybercrime Convention Should Not Become a Tool for

The U.N. Cybercrime Convention Should Not Become a Tool for Political Control or the Watering Down of Human Rights

Negotiations for a U.N. cybercrime convention have entered a critical stage. U.N. member states disagree on what “cybercrime” means and what should be the human rights safeguards of the future convention.

Related Keywords

China , New York , United States , Malaysia , Budapest , Hungary , Nigeria , India , Iran , Singapore , Brazil , Vienna , Wien , Austria , Russia , Pakistan , Ukraine , Chinese , Russian , American , Alexander Seger , Ad Hoc Committee , Budapest Convention , Budapest Cybercrime Convention , International Covenant On Civil , Council Of Europe , Un Human Rights Committee , Organization For Economic Cooperation , Un Ad Hoc Committee , Border Data Forum , European Union , Still The Budapest Convention , Un Convention Against Corruption , Communications Technologies For Criminal Purposes , Council Of Europe Budapest Convention On Cybercrime , Hoc Committee , General Provisions , Procedural Measures , Law Enforcement , Consolidated Negotiation , International Convention , Communications Technologies , Criminal Purposes , Ukraine Unsurprisingly , Budapest Cybercrime , South American , Bad Seeds From , Consolidated Negotiation Document , Proposes Criminalizing , Due Process Safeguards , State Party , Cross Border Data Forum , Against Corruption , Second Additional Protocol , Personal Data , Inter American Conventions , Human Rights , International Covenant , Political Rights , Rights Committee , Economic Cooperation , Government Access , Private Sector Entities , Politics , Jaw ,

© 2025 Vimarsana