on carry johnson in doha with the little katara main stories now, shall anker's president and prime minister have agreed to resign after a day of protest that sore, both their homes overrun by demonstrators. the speaker of parliament says the president got to by raj, a pack, so we'll step down on wednesday. while prime minister, running a week from a singer says he'll leave once a new government is in place. it marked a major escalation in months of protests over the worst economic crisis in decades . michelle fernandez reports from caliber. oh, they sent the dd when protested. see the president and his government would be fools to step down. in by the evening came the announcement. a burying towel door at that retainer sounds when he agreed to act according to the agreement by party leaders and stepped down. but because he wants a peaceful transfer of power, that he has asked me to inform the people of his decision to step down on july 13th . the analogous, many blame godaddy, roger passes for an economic crisis. it's made life unbearable for many of the countries 22000000 people. after breaking through barricades. yet another unprecedented moment, the demonstrators turned into the president official residence in colombo. inside, this is what it looked like. what the president was moved by he security team to an undisclosed location earlier that protested ransacked his bedroom and 2 fiddlers on his bed. who in moments the presidential, who once reserved to the country's top leaders, appeared more like a recreational center where we had to that may not allow my, our government leaders must leave sri lanka. they can't govern the country properly . we have children and we're on the streets leaving our jobs because we believe in this cause. we love the country and we are suffering protests as charged the barricades outside the premise. his house, which the danny sent of lays roger boxes political allies know this is a crucial movement for their party. anger is rising, the government's handling of a diagonal crisis. the worst in 70 years. the frustration appears to have turned into a movement that can noon be ignored in the end, neither curfew, not a freeze on the distribution of fuel, nor host of other intimidation tactics, were able to keep the 10s of thousands of people away from colombo to drive the president go to albert, roger pox a way they say that successive years of management, corruption and looting of the country's resources has brought the country to its knees. and they've had enough men of fernandez. i'll just iraq, colombo argentina's, government is facing a rising tide of protests as it struggles to reigning, rampant inflation on saturday, protested from across the political divide held a separate rallies in bonus iris to denounce the government's handling of the crisis. the left is angry with the terms of this, he has debt to deal with i m f on many on the right of protesting against corruption. her abortion rights activists have held demonstrations across united states in washington dc, civil rights groups organized in march and the city near the white house. it follows last month's decision by the supreme court to overturn the roe versus wade routing at legalized abortion. nationwide pose have opened in elections for japan's opera, house of parliament. the vote is being overshadowed by fridays assassination of a former prime minister schanzer abbe during a campaign event for the routing liberal democrats. some analysts are predicting a wave of sympathy votes for the party the police chief in the city where i was shot dead has admitted that there were security problems. officers are investigating whether the gunman named is 41 year old to test. so u. m. a gummy acted alone. he says he had a grudge against an organization with connections to the former japanese leader. there's all the headlines in these continues here on al jazeera after the bottom line. ah hi, i'm steve clemens and i have a question. if somebody economists and politicians from both political party saw it coming, why didn't joe biden see inflation coming? let's get to the bottom line. ah, just one year ago, optimism floated through the air. the economy was booming after a gigantic pandemic relief package of $1.00 trillion dollars. people were buying new cars and old cars and stuff. lots of stuff on amazon. some even decided that they didn't want to work for a while. cash was flowing and extended unemployment benefits and rent relief paid many folks more than they made before the pandemic. we'll guess what economists call that kind of situation. a classic overstimulated economy. overnight, there was much more demand than supply then boom, the supply crisis hits. there wasn't enough to buy prices surged, and that's all before russia even invaded ukraine to shoot up the price of gas and all forms of energy, the debbie downers were out there shouting, inflation is coming, inflation is coming. but who wants to hear that job? i didn't want his folks out there saying the i word. now the white house may be finally admitting that it got this all wrong. but what can you do now? to day we're talking to doug holtz iq and former director of the congressional budget office and current president of the american action forum a domestic policy think take here in washington, dc. does it's really great to be with you. i'm thanks to you. if heard where i'm going with this, i'm sort of interested in how in economics, so many people can look at the same ecosystem and see it so differently. but from a policy perspective, if you get inflation wrong, you're getting a lot wrong. i am i right. you are, once you let inflation getting grained, as we have, you essentially have no good choices at choice. number one is live with the inflation. that's clearly not gonna fly. people are very unhappy or do the things necessary to take that overstimulated economy and slow it down, raise interest rate. it's in the extreme raise taxes, cut spending, all of that produces weaker housing markets, weaker labor markets, weaker retail sales. that's bad news for american people. so you're looking at a situation where there is no good news. all the choices are hard ones. so this is june of 2022. going into july. an election is coming up in november. it's hard to imagine things getting worse where they were given the toxic political situation we've had in this country. we saw what happened unfolded in january 6. now we're seeing the price of you know, of gas of, of basic supplies baby formula of a peanut butter. i mean years, you just name it out there and prices are surging. i'm just interested as someone who has been in the halls of power, who have advised presidential candidates, you know, what would you do in the situation? what would you advise president biden to do in the situation? he has the following very simple problem. ah, if you look at the monthly reports on personal income and outlays in the behavior of american households, they are spending money. they're continuing to spend money, they have a lot in the bank from the big stimulus, jackson and the, and the spending fine. and the, that sort of part of the economy is fine. if you look at the consumer sentiment surveys, we have consumer confidence at the lowest point since the depths of the 1980 recession. so people are behaving as if they've got the money, but they don't feel good about it and they're really unhappy and they're blaming the president and leadership. if you're in that situation, you have essentially 2 choices. choice number one has changed the subject. i don't think that will work. they've tried that on a number of occasions. choice number 2 is acknowledge some responsibility and, and take action. and so in similar situations, we have seen presidents let some people go say, look, my economic advisors have failed. the american people, i'm going to get an achievement and i wouldn't be shot to see that. you know, one of the things i'm always intrigued with and yet are you and i have talked about economic issues for a long time. and it's always fair. you know, to have contending perspectives into debate, which is what happens even among the federal reserve board governors. but i want to go back to a tweet that heather bourget tweeted out in june of 2021. let's show this week reads as the viruses contain, the economy is improving step by step. today's data on inflation is the latest indicator that things are both moving in the right direction, and that we have supply chain hiccups. now in part this, this tweet was in response to folks like senator joe mansion at the time. and you began hearing a chorus, folks included some leading democratic commas, like lawrence summers, a former secretary, the treasury, jason firm, and a former chairman of the council economic advisors under president obama saying we've got a problem folks. i'm just interested. you are a practitioner in this field, you know, been in c, b o you advised senator mccain. how could this tweet be one? ah, you know, it's some level, how does this tweet get the, the reward or the condemnation it deserves? and how do you go back and say, wow, you know, mansion was basically calling something early on that he was worried about. so early on, many people were worried about this. so, so now the clock back to the key moment, which is march of 2021 of the american rescue plan is being debated. cons, congress, $1.00 trillion dollars in us spending and tasked us a big stimulus. and at that moment, the posture of the white house and the democrats in congress is this economy needs a lot of help. and we need to give it something very big. and, and the motto you heard was better air on size being too big than too small and, and they pushed har. i testified about the american rescue plan at the time. and all the data indicated economy is growing at 6.5 percent as, as indeed it turned out did. in the 1st quarter of 2021. there was no need for stimulus. so this was a political call that they were going to get try to take credit for the recovery by having this big stimulus. and they made a big policy here. larry summers to his credit, set it at the time. so this gonna cause a lot of inflation. other people were worried about it. i didn't think because what a flashing full disclosure i thought was a big boom, an asset prices because people wouldn't be able to spend money and they go buy criptos and houses. and we'd seen some of that already. but either way, we were gonna force the feds hand to do something and i thought it was a mistake. that weighed house tweet was trying to say, look, it's not our fault. the inflation is from the supply side. we didn't do it. and we got this growth and we want to take credit for. i don't think they get credit for the growth. it was there anyway, they inherited it and you only measure supply relative the demand. they hadn't done the rescue plan, the supply problems wouldn't have been. so prevalent, so i think they really missed the boat analytically on this and, and they tried to cover it politically and they've been in trouble ever since. you know, one of the other dimensions out there in terms of big spending in the economy didn't, didn't happen was the build back better package, the early versions of the build, better back, better plan folks were about 6 trillion dollars. that's what bernie sanders wanted at the, you know, the and then getting it to 3 and a half was, was a huge controversy. and then the even bigger controversy was getting that down to 1750000. you know, senator mansion was looked at as sort of the devil incarnate for cain are suggesting. all right, and now that didn't happen either. and maybe when the climate energy bill or something comes along, it'll be 900000000000 or trillion with the point as you saw this, i guess my question to you, we don't even have to play with the 6 trillion. what if the 3 trillion 3 an afternoon or the 1.75 trillion dollar package had come on when it did? would things would it have impacted these numbers would apply, you know, impacted inflation. the supply chain crisis, you know that the, the supply crisis in general, how would that have played out if it had come to be? so the supply crisis is not complicated. it's the fact that we have, okay. demick and globally, workers have been unable to go to regular shifts at their factories, regular shifts of transportation. and as a result, things are all messed up in with, with logic that, that's, that's the pandemic that gets solved only by the public health response around the globe. so you have to live with that, that's there. given that it's there, you can't have too much demand. and i think senator mansion has a really, i saved the cumbersome the administration by, by stopping this, the political dynamic was we want to do all this stuff. streamline, broad scope to the bill, back. better plan and as the numbers had to get smaller, the way they did it was let's front load these programs, have them only just for year 2 years, 3 years. let's back load the taxes and make it all at up till better a degree. well, if you think about that front loaded spending back go to pay force, that's a stimulus bill. and that would have been the mechanistic went all over again, bigger in an economy that was clearly already having a big inflation problem. and it would have been a, in worse policy error than the microscopy plan was. so they really are benefited from mansions, insistence that they not go full. well listen, let's listen to president biden for a moment. you know, state the reality of how he see things right. now the idea we're going to be able to and out quick switch, bring down the cost of gasoline, is not likely in the near term, nor is it with regard to food. so he's basically saying we're stuck in this situation for a while. if i should, i be able to, you know, flip a switch, i'm just interested in what policy levers are out there. and i understand that the federal reserve is independent allegedly, from the white house. but when you kind of look at the question of the big role, the government plays out there, you know, in terms of talk about what sorts of you know, we use talk about soft landings. ah, you know, to try to bring an economy down to sort of manage the cycles and economy. i'm just interested in knowing from you. what are the levers that can be moved, that the president is saying he doesn't have to deal with gas that deal with food to deal with inflation? so 1st let me say that the inflation problem is the fact that shelter as inflation of 5 and a half percent. so that was essentially a one percent at the beginning of the president's term. ah, that's not something that moves quickly. that's not like food or see a bounce up a down. certainly not like energy we're global markets can move overnighting and raise and lower the price will dramatically shelter is rents and it's owning homes, and the inflation started slowly. and it's never yet pete. it's gone up month after month after month. and if you've got 5 and a half percent shelter inflation, you can hit the feds to percent target unless everything else is 0 or negative. and that's not going to happen. so if you think about the problem, the problem is how do we slow down the housing market? stop becoming so red hot that year over year housing prices on a 20 percent euro or your rent going up 20 percent and get the overall economy back to a regional place. you have 2 choices. you can do it with taxes and spending, or you can do it with the fed. the feds got a plan and if plan is simple, we're going to raise interest rates and in particular make mortgages rates higher. unlike mortgage is less attractive, which makes by house less attractive, which makes building houses less attractive. which means that you don't put up refrigerators in those houses. you don't put furnaces in this house. you don't pay the driveways, you don't do the electrical work. you have an impact on the broad swath of the economy by cooling down the housing market. and so that's, that's what the feds up to. it's largely the housing market and also shopping autos and other consumer dorval's would make those things more expensive slow down the economy. unfortunately, if you're in a white house you want to be seen is just sitting by and letting someone else solve the problem. you want to do something the things they would have to do would be the reverse of the, the stimulus race axis, cat spending, that's not going to happen. this is an election year. there's very little substantively they can do. the one thing that stands out to me is they could roll back some of the trump era tariffs, particularly on china, and have a a discernible one time impact on the, the level of price as an economy. and i have been surprised if they're reluctant to pull that level, that's something i at least would advise them to do. so you mentioned trade. i mean, and i'd love to just go and not further in that because you know, when the, when the president laid out his indo pacific in economic framework recently, there wasn't a return to the trans pacific partnership. there wasn't a widget region wide trade deal put on the table. and if you look on the, the gas and fuel side of it, you know, the president is going to be meeting up with the saudi crown prince allegedly, a ma had been so mon and others are there things that can be done in terms of whether domestic in the united states, or because we're the biggest oil and energy producer in the world, but with the saudis, or the other players, to basically help, you know, create a lot more. so a demand than we're doing on, on oil, gas and other forms of energy. certainly on both fronts, you could in principle on get additional production, it takes some time and they would have to acknowledge the need ah, as specially duly. you turn on their climate strategy, which has been to really call our fuel sources as the strategy. we're not gonna use coal, we're not going to use oil, we're not gonna use natural gas. i don't agree with that strategy that has been their strategy directed to you turning that in are reluctant politically to do that . and then we'll have to, to kind of deal with the saudis, where, you know, let's, let's just be delicate. i mean, relations are not at their all time best of in, and there's a lot of concern about the saudis. and so i think they've been hesitant to get into that game and, and they're, they're trying to said the set expectations that gasoline in a low price of roommate, ah, ah, i think they also have a general trade problem. if you look at the, the framework they just announced in the pacific time framework, that's not a traditional trade agreement that lowers tariffs, increases market access, reduces costs of production and consumption. that they, they don't seem to want to do that. we don't see any market access moves at all and said these are agreements, the sort of st. well, we have a bunch of domestic problems in common corruption, tax collections. let's work on those. now we're gonna do a real 1st on this show because i've never had cardi be on this show. and i wonder, but let's bring a carty be tweet on carty, be rights when you all think they going to announce that we going into a recession. so let me ask you that, ah, when are we? when do you think mr. economic advisor, we're going into a recession. i think the recession talk is, is way overblown. um that though the reality is that the inflation and the hot labor market or the flip side of the same problem, you don't get the inflation without a labor market that hot and you don't get a mark of that hot with a generation inflation. none of that sounds like a recession to me. so ah, yes, the federal reserve is going to raise rates and slow down the economy. it is val, it's goal is, as you mentioned earlier, to have a soft landing slow growth enough that inflation pressures come down. bu