all the acts which may or may not be criminal that occurred for example in background airbase in the alleged torture chambers, those fell within the jurisdiction from 2002 they have not been investigated. that's a serious problem. you say it's a serious problem if you accept the glaring sort of failing of the international justice framework at the moment. why on earth are you now seeking to push the notion of internationaljustice even further and take on the concept of what you are calling ecocide, to have the international criminal system take on the notion that those responsible for the most egregious acts against the planets welfare should be criminally prosecuted? it's not conceivably going to happen. it is actually could happen but let me separate out the two issues. the first issue is internationaljustice generally, am i in favour of developing the systems, absolutely? it a long game you can't expect human rights to exist for millennia and then in 1945 to create rules on bits of paper and say you can't commit