that must not make us before it into thinking that this is just mutated into a mild cold. this is still a very nasty virus, and if you think about it, if the reduction in hospitalisation rate is 50% and it is doubling every two days, then just two days of more data would mean that the hospital numbers are just the same number so it is not going to mean that a hospitals are not going to see a large surge case numbers. but not going to see a large surge case numbers. �* ,., ., �*, not going to see a large surge case numbers. �* ., �*, , , numbers. but so that's the numbers side of it, in — numbers. but so that's the numbers side of it, in the _ numbers. but so that's the numbers side of it, in the sense _ numbers. but so that's the numbers side of it, in the sense that - numbers. but so that's the numbers side of it, in the sense that it - numbers. but so that's the numbers side of it, in the sense that it is - side of it, in the sense that it is spreading, the numbers are high, but in terms of the severity, does it mean that... have you been able to work out, is it people who are unvaccinated corporate on mentally ending up with 0micron? what is the logic there, or is itjust too small —— kind of ending up with? it logic there, or is it just too small -- kind of ending up with? it looks like previous _ -- kind of ending up with? it looks like previous infection _ -- kind of ending up with? it looks like previous infection is _ -- kind of ending up with? it looks like previous infection is causing i like previous infection is causing some reduction in hospitalisation