this case because, like myself, this is purely a, this is prosecutorial misconduct, as far as i'm concerned, by looked at the evidence here. this case vindicates what i've been saying all along, the fact that there is no evidence, no direct evidence against police officer porter. and i think what we're going to start to see, we'll see a domino effect here, in these next trials here, and we'll start either seeing hung juries or acquittals on these next couple of officers that will be going against -- >> a lot of it, though, danny, depends on the jury. the makeup of the jury who they happen to get. it's a roll of the dice anytime you put a case in front of a jury. it does seem like a lot of these other cases, though, would have depended on porter's testimony and they clearly usually tried the case they think is the easiest to try first. no? >> maybe not. this may have been a real -- a level of strategy that may end up backfiring. by trying porter first, if he