have all sorts of assertions, no real way to resolve them, and i'm afraid even if he sits in the chair, the house is not going to get a lot of information out of him for that reason. >> but in theory it would not cover issues of obstruction of justice, actual assertions of a crime, right? >> i think that's right. but again, whether it's a crime or not is subject to a legal analysis and, you know, it's just -- i think it's going to be a mess. i think they're unlikely to get a lot of good information from him beyond what he already testified to or spoke to mueller's team about. >> i agree. however, mcgahn has a lot of power in this himself. i mean he can really decide whether he wants to answer questions or not, and he now, barring a stay, has a real opportunity to do that if he's so inclined. >> great to have you on tonight. thank you very much. jeffrey toobin, stick around. there's more lawyering to be done. one quick note before we take a break. the supreme court late today gave the president a breather, suspending for now the house