correctly. so i don't think can you criticize the jury for doing what the law probably required them to do. >> 100% agree, it was a horrible thing here and people want to not see someone rewarded for doing something horrible. chad littlefield and chris kyle were doing something good and their families will never have them back. when you're a prosecutor this is a social commentary. mental illness, we call you crazy and you're a weird little guy and we're going to liken it to heart disease and cancer. does it show that we know how to deal with it in this society. >> this jury had ample evidence to find either way, i would argue. there was information before this jury to say, this was a premeditated act. if you look at yesterday's testimony. with regard to the expert who analyzed the crime scene. he described it as a sneak attack. that would be indicative of someone who plotted and planned, waited until people could not pose any danger to themselves. and then acted and acted to take