the inspector general's report. omitted information the fbi had obtained from another u.s. agency meaning the cia detailed the entire relationship with page detailing he had been approved as an operational contact for the other agency from 2018 to 2013 concerning his contacts with certain russian intelligence. wouldn't that have been a really relevant thing to know? that the cia had trusted carter page and he had helped the u.s. government? >> it's a very relevant fact and it is one that absolutely should have been brought to the court's attention. so in a fisa package, the fbi is obligated to provide all the information we have to the court that's relevant. both information that's derogatory or makes the proposed target look like he might be an agent of a foreign power. and information that's mitigating. that would have been a mitiga