though she may feel that it is, because she's saying that the government's forcing her to speak when she issues these marriage licenses but it's pretty clear that her speech if any, it's not her own personal speech, it's her official speech in her official capacity claiming that the governor's order to issue same sex marriages violating her religious rights. a court has concluded that order itself is religion neutral. it's only a general order to begin issuing same sex marriage licens licenses. it says nothing at all about religion. since that discriminatory intent isn't there she's not likely to prevail there either. >> so interesting. her mother was county clerk for something like 35 years. she was the deputy. how do you see this whole thing ending? does this become sort of a court battle between what you're required to legally enforce and what it is you believe in your heart is right? >> you know, it's an excellent