i don't think so. and i think that the derision over that particular issue, it gives the critics a foothold when, in fact, i do believe having watched mountains of cnn coverage, that there's been a lot of very good, solid, explanatory stuff. i like martin savidge up there in ontario in that flight simulator talking about like what would happen here and it gives you sort of a sense of what might have gone on. it's as close to like sort of like responsible speculation as i think that you can get. and on the speculation thing too, i also believe that if you watch -- read the coverage too like "the wall street journal" story, had his story about a week and a half ago, talking about how the plane could have gone on, he has people talked about how investigators are going over various scenarios and it became very clear that investigators speculate as well. so when you have officials speculating, it's -- i think it's less condemnable when a