that totally respect the judge's decision j but in our view is a california case. >> what does nunes want? >> i'd love to live in his head for a day and to be able to properly answer that question, but it's impossible for me to speculate about that at this point. i know from my perspective, this is about freedom of speech, and this is about our first amendment. and very clearly, if you go back and look at why the first amendment was written, and you look at what james madison who by the way was a virginian, had to say about it. it's about the people being able to exert control over the government, and use free speech in order to hold the government accountable. it's not about government being able to censor the people, and so from my perspective, i don't know what the congressman is trying to accomplish here and what goes on in his head and what his thinking is. but to me it looks very much like somebody who has sworn an oath to support and defend the constitution is sort of picking and choosing about which bits he