characteristics. there's no clear line for applying rebellion. there's no clear statement that it applies to the president. there's no popular long standing understanding confirming its application. there's no clear procedure for determining the facts if congress decides he engage d in insurrection, but florida decides he did not. is the court to then engage in fact finding of its own. and what you have most articulated is a desire that this be a 9-0 decision. even if they take the position that you don't think is correct, you don't want to see a split. explain that. >> i'm deeply concerned about the consequences of this decision for the supreme court. many people say forget the supreme court. i get ta. but as a law professor, it's important to me that the supreme court sustain its authority as a critical element of our government and acting in wits that are not political. i would disagree with the