worked as a prosecutor on security fraud cases in that office. what we can glean from what the times says about the subpoenas that apparently, where we should, note happened in the summer. >> so chris, we've heard a lot in public reporting about these properties. and how the former president, and trump organization may have manipulated the value of these assets in order to get paid treatment for these, lenders and so the key question here is, that's the question that the manhattan district attorney has to ask. he needs to stay, that look, shady is their actual crime. here and new york, new york, law the key to that question. we don't have a bank fraud statue. so the key to that question, there are number different statues but they all require intense. and specifically, intent to defraud. so the key question in this case is can the prosecutor prove that even if this was going, on and it was shady, was