skepticism, the degree to which they seemed downright hostile to this argument. you played a clip there of a judge cutting off the lawyer for president trump who not only were advancing losing arguments but they were also trying to stall. they were saying things like this court should look at each individual document, document by document, and that's when the judge said whoa, whoa, whoa, we're not looking at these individual documents, which would take months and months and months. what she said was the question here is who gets to decide, is it the current president or a former president? and they seemed very skeptical of this idea that a former president can decide. and in fact, they also suggested that it's quite possible that even the court shouldn't be deciding this case and instead simply deferring to the current president, president biden. >> yeah. they kept citing that there's no conflict between the branches in this case, that to the extent that the court is there to adjudicate those kind of intergovernmental, interbranch conflicts there's no -- you know, both branches agree. the president and congress. to your point about it, there was at one point where trump's