Live Breaking News & Updates on Act of parliament

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Act of parliament on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Act of parliament and stay connected to the pulse of your community

The Context

end of— compromise. but we are right at the end of this _ compromise. but we are right at the end of this process. this is now the detail, _ end of this process. this is now the detail, the — end of this process. this is now the detail, the small print of a bill. it detail, the small print of a bill. it is _ detail, the small print of a bill. it is not — detail, the small print of a bill. it is not the broad principles and whether— it is not the broad principles and whether it — it is not the broad principles and whether it is right or wrong. i sopported _ whether it is right or wrong. i supported the bill at second reading principle _ supported the bill at second reading principle vote and we are now at the end stage _ principle vote and we are now at the end stage where we are just getting the detail— end stage where we are just getting the detail right. that is a moment where _ the detail right. that is a moment where the — the detail right. that is a moment where the government can, without compromising its principles, make the small— compromising its principles, make the small adjustments that will then allow the _ the small adjustments that will then allow the bill to become law, and it is in the _ allow the bill to become law, and it is in the government interests but that bill— is in the government interests but that bill to — is in the government interests but that bill to become an act of parliament as soon as possible. it parliament as soon as possible. sounds like parliament as soon as possible. tit sounds like the parliament as soon as possible. tt sounds like the government is saying that for those people who have potentially served alongside british forces, future ones that might not necessarily be the case. t5 forces, future ones that might not necessarily be the case.— necessarily be the case. is that enou:h necessarily be the case. is that enough for _ necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? _ necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? i _ necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? i think - necessarily be the case. is that enough for you? i think we - necessarily be the case. is that. enough for you? i think we need clarity— enough for you? i think we need clarity here. i understand the government point of view, that they do not _ government point of view, that they do not want — government point of view, that they do not want to vague or opaque a category, _ do not want to vague or opaque a category, but i think we all know then— category, but i think we all know then when— category, but i think we all know then when we see them. they are people _ then when we see them. they are people who are clearly in danger, their— people who are clearly in danger, their cases — people who are clearly in danger, their cases have not yet been resolved _ their cases have not yet been resolved. and i think that it is in

Bill , Process , Detail , Principles , Print , Whether , Stage , The-end , It , It-detail , Compromise , Principle-vote

Verified Live

their liberty and their livelihood and they've been waiting far too long for the truth, forjustice and for compensation, so i'm glad the prime minister is putting forward a proposal. we will look at the details and think it's the job of all of us and i think it's the job of all of us to make sure that it delivers the justice that is so needed. this has been described by the justice secretary as an unprecedented scandal. and passing a law to exoneration whole swathes of people all at once and passing a law to exonerate whole swathes of people all at once is certainly seen as a radical step. but some have doubts about politicians invading the territory usually occupied byjudges. some of those who have reviewed miscarriages ofjustice believe there is a better solution than an act of parliament. it�*s only the court of appeal that can definitively say in each individual case, this conviction is unsafe and therefore must be quashed. acts of parliament

Prime-minister , Compensation , Truth , Job , Details , All-of-us , Livelihood , Proposal , Liberty , Forjustice , People , Law

Politics Live

and the shadow paymaster general, jonathan ashworth and the deputy political editor vikki at younger. what does it mean? it's a big step, an act of parliament saying that hundreds of people will have their convictions overturned. it is pretty unprecedented and i don't think anyone can really remember a moment when it has happened and there is definitely concerning government about doing this because it's such a significant step. i think the view is that this is a very exceptional circumstance and has been going on a very long time and that is why this action is justified. very long time and that is why this action isjustified. i think it is worth saying there are dozens, hundreds of mps who have been campaigning on this for a long time. it's not true westminster did not know about this, and there was a public inquiry but it's all been too slow and it has left so many people with their lives ruined and it does just go to show that when the eyes of the country are focused on an issue how quickly the wheels of

People , Step , Hundreds , Political-editor-vikki , Act-of-parliament , Shadow-paymaster-general , Edward-agar , Jonathan-ashworth , Government , Convictions , Anyone , Industrial-action