Stay updated with breaking news from Bomb jack. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
world in that regard, isn't it? i mean, red lines being erased left and right. what what are the new ones or are there any now iran versus israelis now out in the open? >> so the new robbed line that the iranians were trying to establish an may have established, is that in the future, if these ladies ever strike another iranian embassy or iranian assets of personnel is syria, lebanon, there will be retaliation now, the israelis are trying to defy that they wanted to make sure that that is not the new norm is nothing new equation in the region as the volumes put it, because they want to continue to have the freedom of action that they have enjoyed, protected in which they have been able to strike at almost all of their neighbors, more or less with him this was the first time in decades that we saw at the israelis appears to have lost that impunity. and whether this strike today against the bomb will be able to reestablish that impunity
serious legislator who deals with policy and the best way is sit down and talk to them. that is former house speaker kevin mccarthy talking about marjorie taylor greene the pro january 6 space leader's police congresswoman. that is how you know her. last summer after forging the lines with speaker mccarthy she had a rebranding. mtg2.0 was not going to the bomb thrower a more sophisticated lawmaker and yield her more fashion. when mats gaetz led a revolt greene sided with mccarthy. this was the newer mtg and governing, it. right. guess how long that lasted? >> here he is mike johnson a constitutional attorney who has turned into a mini tyrant.
>> you are a man of peace. the question becomes is it posturing or is it a step back for a ron? is iran trying to to step back from their foreign minister's comments that we just played you a short time ago saying this would be a decisive robust responsive israel reaches our area. now they are saying... >> everybody knows it's all about what the people in the street think. that is the true reality. makes no difference when anybody in the media says. iran has most of the people against them. the few that support them, how did this happen? it's about the street. the second thing is a lot of people understand why is israel going after the nukes. we are only 15 million people in the world. we are not a lot we lost 6 million out of 1575 years ago. one bomb can take care of 7 million.
The Ingraham Angle vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
they don't have the missile, delivery system or the bomb but they could have the fuel within a week. it would have been a year if the iran nuclear deal had still been in place. both iran and israel are staying quiet so far. no one in israel is bragging, they're not claiming credit for this. what does that say about their intention at least to avoid a wider war? >> really a tale of two aerial barrages. i mean, iran's was public. it was highly telegraphed. it was 320 munitions. it was designed to inflict damage, not just against military targets but potentially against israel's population. it overflew jerusalem in a very highly and public way, and iran was went 0 for 320, i mean, a completely and utterly fail with zero military effects. israel's operation, on the other hand, was small. it was limited. it was highly calibrated. it wasn't publicly acknowledged, so it maintained this air of
was some distance away. - have fallen near isfahan. i think it was some distance away. isfahan| have fallen near isfahan. i think it i was some distance away. isfahan is at the centre of iran? uranium enrichment process and israel have strong suspicions that they are doing more thanjust strong suspicions that they are doing more than just doing this for nuclear power. they believe that they could produce a nuclear bomb if they could produce a nuclear bomb if they wish to. iran denies this. israel thinks it might be a short time away from being able to do that. this was not an attack on iran? nuclearfacilities, just that. this was not an attack on iran? nuclear facilities, just to that. this was not an attack on iran? nuclearfacilities, just to be clear. israel's officials have often hinted that they may be forced to do that, but that was not this attack. they are specifically address that in the run—up to this attack, saying there would be a tit—for—tat response towards israel's nuclear facilities, they said they knew where those were. it has not
between his body language and the trial? _ between his body language and the trial? at_ between his body language and the trial? �* . between his body language and the trial? . , ,., , trial? at this point, very preliminary. _ trial? at this point, very preliminary. we - trial? at this point, very preliminary. we don't i trial? at this point, very i preliminary. we don't have trial? at this point, very - preliminary. we don't have that. as of right now, he's considered likely. _ as of right now, he's considered likely, which means he's very critical — likely, which means he's very critical as— likely, which means he's very critical. as of right now, he's still— critical. as of right now, he's still alive _ critical. as of right now, he's still alive.— critical. as of right now, he's still alive. critical. as of right now, he's stillalive. . . ., . , still alive. are you it aware of any fire disturbing... _ still alive. are you it aware of any fire disturbing... ? _ still alive. are you it aware of any fire disturbing... ? we're - fire disturbing... ? we're looking for that right _ fire disturbing... ? we're looking for that right now. _ fire disturbing... ? we're looking for that right now. five _ fire disturbing... ? we're looking for that right now. five minutes. for that right now. five minutes ago. _ for that right now. five minutes ago, i— for that right now. five minutes ago, i didn't see criminal history in ago, ididn't see criminal history in new— ago, i didn't see criminal history in new york. | ago, i didn't see criminal history in new york-— in new york. i 'ust want commissioner- in new york. i just want commissioner to - in new york. i just want commissioner to step i in new york. i just want | commissioner to step in in new york. i just want - commissioner to step in and talk about what he did immediately after to make sure the area is safe. thank you, commissioner— to make sure the area is safe. thank you, commissioner sheppard. - you, commissioner sheppard. immediately following, i requested the bond _ immediately following, i requested the bond quad to come and search the area -- _ the bond quad to come and search the area -- bomb — the bond quad to come and search the area —— bomb squad. they're doing this right _ area —— bomb squad. they're doing this right now behind me with canines— this right now behind me with canines checking vehicles. as of riglit— canines checking vehicles. as of
histories from my raisins and this is really a concerted, which or a sibling. everything you heard, this is a witch hunt by numerous judges democratic judges. >> you take a look at it and goren is a huaxia. when he did was a disgrace is being reviewed by the appellant and i hope they do justice is everybody's looking and nobody no business is coming into the city. >> none whatsoever they're looking at that case cases and threat to democracy, frankly, what took place bag a cricket ag, letitia james paid and the facts we can or the fact that i'm going to get drunk bomb, going to get trump. that's all she said for two years and its people don't want to see this stuff we have violent criminal zola with the streets of new york and nothing happens. so even when they catch him, they let him know bao nobel whatsoever so this is just a
distinguished. foreign policy failures. i think the major problem right now the way the biden administration is dealing with iran is they are clinging to this delusion from back when he was partnering with obama to do capitulation as their foreign policy that they can bring iran back into the community of nations if they just treat them nicely enough. and that is never going to happen. you know, the idea doesn't mean to do these horrible things is insane. it's a feature, not a bug in the islamist system that they run. they are looking for armageddon and they are willing to do what it takes to get to it and we are all just playing along as if that's something we can change. >> pete: yeah, they have had that view. obama had that view because he had a fanciful view of the resolution and rejecting the shaw and colonialism and now stuck with iran almost having a bomb these ayatollahs. nathan, the white house did issue new sanctions on israel