Stay updated with breaking news from Cable news outlet. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
right now. it s not an order, the president s opinion. are president trump s tweets considered official white house statements? the president is the president of the united states, they re considered official statements by the president of the united states. wow. good morning. and welcome to morning joe. i m confused. so confused. what is that line from the office ? universe, you win. it s thursday, august 2nd. and what a way to start the day. what a way. so, is it the official policy of the president or not? i think the most telling thing of the whole story is how much his lawyers freaked out immediately and started calling around immediately. he was just venting. just like a baseball game. when he s actually doing what talking about what would start a constitutional crisis. or obstruction of justice. as brian clause pointed out yesterday is exactly what he did in turkey back 2013, 2014. talk about fake news. you talk about deep state conspiracies. you ....
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. about mollie tibbetts. the trump organization, according to this indictment, said michael cohen pled guilty to lies saying that the money it reimbursed michael cohen for paying off stormy daniels was legal expenses. that s a lie. that is dishonest. that s a violation of law. isn t that why you hire an attorney. to give them the money so they do it legally and lawfully? then you list it as paying off somebody for their silence, not as legal expenses. it went to her. she is not a lawyer. he is a lawyer. is that what mark elias did with the dossier money? all those millions of dollars, did that get fully disclosed? no, they were paid to attorneys and those attorneys went and funded this dirty dossier, right? they weren t trying to buy anybody s silence? they were trying to by a dirty dossier. can we be spared the argu ....
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. incredible. jason: david, has there been equal justice under the law or does it seem lopsided? during the clinton administration, it was richard and the democrats who were screaming that someone s personal matters are not an impeachable offense. here we are now, 20 years later, and it s a personal matter that the president was handling and somehow it is not campaign violation because he used personal money. if that is their new standard, then let s start the investigation, because did elizabeth warren pay lawyers to help her get out of her situation, claiming to be a native american and to get an advantage at harvard? or let s go to bernie sanders. did he pay a lawyer to help his wife get out of trouble in her scandal of trying to raise money after college? let s go back to elizabeth warren. david, here s the difference. h ....
Here s a bit more of that interview. i can tell you that i m pleased that the court accepted our argument and recognized that the constitution s provision about speech and debate does apply to the vice president but the way they sorted that out and the requirements of my testimony going forward are subject of our review right now, and i ll have more to say about that in the days ahead. what do you make of that response, particularly coming on probably the most pro-trump kind of cable news outlet. what do you think about the possibility of an appeal or the idea that, you know, maybe this is as far as the former vice president wants to take this legal fight. well, i think the appeal is something that he s always got in his back pocket. i think that appeal is tide to what his next steps are in terms of what his intentions are with the party. two things that stand out to me here with this whole conversation. one, how far pence is willing to twist an interpretation of the ....
The night before the attack on the capitol. according to texts that threat to resign would appear to have been a response to the pressure that was being put on vice president pence. by trump and his co-conspirators, and his pressure to try to get him to effectively spoil the counting of the electoral college votes. in congress. on january 6. did pat cipollone threaten to resign on new year s eve on january 3rd, on january 5th? again we do not know if hannity will respond to this request for him to provide information to the committee. to flesh out the facts around the previously unknown details about what happened. it is interesting they are appealing to his patriotism. and asking him to give information to the committee. i don t know. i think regardless of party, regardless of cable news outlet of your choice, all americans would like to know what mr. hannity knew on january 5th that made him text to the white house, i am very worried about the next 48 hours. what did he know about wh ....