Doesn t involve consistency or facts. it just involves figuring out where he thinks he can get that large audience and along the way, if he is minimizing a sedition, so be it but this is also much larger than mr. carlson with all this exposed, it s all out here fox viewers have been exposed to what happened on january 6th you can say they might be only relying on fox or less informed about certain things but people saw january 6th. it unfolded live we ve shown the fox coverage that day people know what happened. the larger question is whether and why this movement appears to affirm this as their number one speaker and leader, affirm this kind of lying and attacks on democracy and a leadership that is clearly documented built on little more than selling out if you re a fox viewer, it would appear mr. carlson is not being honest with you, it would appear he doesn t think you ll catch
Going to stand for exactly the factual mission that today s tucker opposes and the point is not just hypocrisy, the point is tucker s standard belies his liability now and it shines a weird and perhaps troubling light on how this all works, at least for people like him who are willing to tell you things the dominion suit suggests are misleading or false, and you know with your own eyes aren t true when it comes to january 6th denialism, his trutherism now, he took his mission, though at that time remember, when he said he wasn t going to do what he s doing now. he said he wanted more accuracy in conservative media. and accuracy in any type of media is great he took that argument to the crowd at the famously conservative cpac conference we re going to the archives. watch how that cpac crowd boos then 2010 mr. carlson for simply
Intimately and deeply tied into how many people understand what s happening in our country and whether or not we will have another insurrection, another coup, whether people understand we already had an insurrection and attempted coup is this your king? and as for mr. carlson, who has gone gone on such a journey how does he feel if he s a human being? what does he make of all this? and he is literally living out the thing he used to criticize the right wing shtick, the lies, the type of media who does not do what he said they needed, institutions of accuracy. does he feel like he s lying every day? if he did, would he have it seep out in a projection filled tirade something like this? imagine forcing yourself to tell lies all day about everything in ways that were so transparent and so outlandish that there is no way the people listening to you could possibly
If you re out there. if you re looking for more. we re looking too. we re calling on a new generation of builders for navy s next-gen submarines. we looked at the facts of mr. carlson s career and the largest conservative movement. weaver back with michael steele. your thoughts, sir well, that was a very compelling narrative around how we got from there to here. i think i could sum it up this way in two points. one is a point, the other is a question the point is, tucker has become the shtick in so many ways on pretty much every level. the question is, when you look at that early narrative that tucker was putting out there
Him, he doesn t respect you. if this is what the conservative movement embraces it bridges us to a very famous and simple question is this your king? is this your king huh? is this your king? is this your king the question goes beyond the attributes of in that case the other warrior. the question goes to who you choose to support and what they stand for, and do they represent you. that s a larger question than any particular personality here. we are not as you ll notice trying to personallyattack or demean anyone. we on this program put together this evidence so you could see mr. carlson s facts, his life, his career, his work, which is, whether we like it or not,