Stay updated with breaking news from Doesn t like. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
getting through security and they want to see more of the critics and they say it says three slope with camera or kat involves scanning a passenger's face and comparing those images to their passport and drivers license. it's raising alarms with critic saying it's an invasion of privacy and closely monitored similar programs in china. hears how a new york post op-ed put it. the tsa scanning system could b a big step to a chinese style system that could restrict travel by people the government doesn't like. the head of the controversial program is shooting down concerns about the technology and at the same time admitting that there are some kinks in th system including profiling demographics. no one should worry about being misidentified that is not happening and we work diligentl to ensure that technology is performing according to the highest scientific standards. demographic equitably is a serious issue and represents a
twitter for 44 billion dollars and he has gutted it right? not only are the policies and practices that used to a value eight safety and health, safe, healthy conversations on the platform. he also gutted the people. he fired half the people and the other half that was left, half of those people left on their own accord. those people did that work, that content moderation work, child safety work. general security work. now you just have mosque. like you said, he is deciding what he does and doesn't like. almost in realtime. you could see him working this out. he is imposing sort of his will like a king. as he said, with the austin light is way to process, not seize, general trolls and people who like to cause trouble seal this as a field day. so they have acted accordingly. that is why we are getting this
back in 2017, back when the tesla model 3 launched. look here, favorable democrats versus republicans, republicans 37%, but democrats were at 47%. democrats viewed musk more favorably back then. keep in mind, of course, when it comes to electric cars which is what musk used to be known for, that along with spacex, 65% of democrats favor phasing out gas-powered cars. as musk goes back to the twitter guy versus the electric car guy, the views have changed. >> any of these numbers explain how and why he's become so polarizing. >> social media companies should take an active role in monitoring speech. 55% of republicans disagree with that, just 39% agree. among democrats, 83% agree that social media companies should take an active role in monitoring speech which is something that elon musk really doesn't like. take a look here. internet free speech.
the kurdish groups which it doesn't like, chief among them the pkk, together with any support for creating a kurdish state. anna foster, the bbc�*s middle east correspondent, monitors the war from beirut. what you have on the one hand is turkey, and you have president erdogan�*s desire, he says, to secure the turkish borderfrom kurdish militant groups. in the main, the pkk, the kurdistan workers' party. and what they want is a state for these around about 30 million ethnic kurds who have no state to call their own. some of them are in turkey, some of them are in northern syria, northern iraq, and some of them are in western iran. and they are concentrated in these small areas, one of which borders turkey. and so president erdogan says he needs to keep his border secure, but the kurds say that, as he continues to try and push them away, push them south,
bashar al—assad in power. the war there, which has gone on for more than a decade, has turned into a free—for—all, with various outside powers able to do pretty much what they want. turkey, for instance, is trying to wipe out the kurdish groups which it doesn't like, chief among them the pkk, together with any support for creating a kurdish state. anna foster, the bbc�*s middle east correspondent, monitors the war from beirut. what you have on the one hand is turkey, and you have president erdogan�*s desire, he says, to secure the turkish borderfrom kurdish militant groups. in the main, the pkk, the kurdistan workers�* party. and what they want is a state for these around about 30 million ethnic kurds who have no state to call their own. some of them are in turkey, some of them are in northern syria,
which russia's been fighting to keep the syrian dictator bashar al—assad in power. the war there, which has gone on for more than a decade, has turned into a free—for—all, with various outside powers able to do pretty much what they want. turkey, for instance, is trying to wipe out the kurdish groups which it doesn't like, chief among them the pkk, together with any support for creating a kurdish state. anna foster, the bbc�*s middle east correspondent, monitors the war from beirut. what you have on the one hand is turkey, and you have president erdogan�*s desire, he says, to secure the turkish borderfrom kurdish militant groups. in the main, the pkk, the kurdistan workers' party. and what they want is a state for these around about 30 million ethnic kurds who have no state to call their own.
is trying to wipe out the kurdish groups which it doesn't like, chief among them the pkk, together with any support for creating a kurdish state. anna foster, the bbc�*s middle east correspondent, monitors the war from beirut. what you have on the one hand is turkey, and you have president erdogan�*s desire, he says, to secure the turkish borderfrom kurdish militant groups. in the main, the pkk, the kurdistan workers�* party. and what they want is a state for these around about 30 million ethnic kurds who have no state to call their own. some of them are in turkey, some of them are in northern syria, northern iraq, and some of them are in western iran. and they are concentrated in these small areas, one of which borders turkey. and so president erdogan says he needs to keep his border secure, but the kurds say that, as he continues to try and push them
the first is whether or not the secretary has the ability to set these kinds of priorities. the second is the department of justice asking the supreme court to impose stricter limits on the ability of states like texas or california to go running to the nearest judge every time the federal government does something they don't like. that's why this case could have significant ramifications that go beyond the law. >> how would that have repurr cushion this is other aspects? >> our systems of checks and balances work better when people harmed by the federal government can go to the court and see a judge and get an order that fixes their harm. but not so much so when the federal government is being haul ed into court every time they do something policy related that a state doesn't like. the biden administration is asking the supreme court to make it harder for states to get these kinds of court orders. and sips we have seen an explosion of these court orders,
see. we hide behind proprietary information, that black box and effectively say vague community standards in terms of do whatever we want. that includes information and disinformation and purging what the left doesn't like." >> kayleigh: it is advocacy also so dr. saphier, stacey abrams saying a baby does not have heart beat at six months. an agnostic description white in a mist trending, very neutral but instead efficacy of doctors agree one does not exist during the stage of pregnancy. reports from nbc and mpr come from. but my point is this is broader with hunter biden. it is issue by issue this bias. >> dr. saphier: thankfully we were together on this couch when stacey abrams said that. what she did was twitter and everything else said doctors confirm it but all they did was manipulate the definition they are using. the heartbreak i happen to be a
isn't that an appeal, and olive branch in some way, to get boris johnson's supporters on side? iii. branch in some way, to get boris johnson's supporters on side? hi, my name is rishi — johnson's supporters on side? hi, my name is rishi sunak _ johnson's supporters on side? hi, my name is rishi sunak and _ johnson's supporters on side? hi, my name is rishi sunak and seven - johnson's supporters on side? hi, my name is rishi sunak and seven weeks a-o, name is rishi sunak and seven weeks ago, i— name is rishi sunak and seven weeks ago. ithink— name is rishi sunak and seven weeks ago, i think stab the prime minister and the _ ago, i think stab the prime minister and the back and now i'm saying he's the most _ and the back and now i'm saying he's the most honest prime minister we ever had~ _ the most honest prime minister we ever had. does he think people can't remember— ever had. does he think people can't remember what he ever had. does he think people can't rememberwhat he said? ever had. does he think people can't remember what he said? there's no point _ remember what he said? there's no point appealing to johnson because they won't be loyal. this is the point _ they won't be loyal. this is the point of— they won't be loyal. this is the point of trying to get across. the parliamentary party is still in shambles and it will continue to be, any policy— shambles and it will continue to be, any policy that the johnson nights or any— any policy that the johnson nights or any other faction doesn't like, they— or any other faction doesn't like, they will— or any other faction doesn't like, they willjust block it. we've been in the _ they willjust block it. we've been in the situation pretty much since 2016— in the situation pretty much since 2016 -- _