Live Breaking News & Updates on Hard line immigration stance
Stay updated with breaking news from Hard line immigration stance. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
You, or montero to crowd that, quote, europeans do not want to become peoples of mixed race, which prompted his own, long aide to protest calling it, quote, nazi propaganda. the question is, why is he invited to cpac? scott jennings? well, first of all, i am smiling because i m happy to see you. i m happy to see our friend charlie. thank you, and good to be with you both tonight. the the right has been infatuated with this guy for the last few years. i think, mostly, over immigration. he has a hard line immigration stance. as you know, that was a motivating policy item for donald trump when he came on the scene. it strikes me that is where the infatuation with him started. it is not unusual in this country, i will say, for political parties to become infatuated with foreign leaders. the left was infatuated with fidel castro for a few years, not that long ago. it isn t the first time it s happened. i tend to look inward for my ....
Relatively safe ground for them to oppose the president. they are not opposing him on a hard line immigration stance. they are making a tax argument that it will hurt it is a tax hike and will hurt his constituents in key states. i agree with you. safe ground, but still notable. as you know, for two and a half years, pundits said, what will be the moment? was it charlottesville? no. the vile access hollywood tape? no. separating families at the border? nope. siding with vladimir putin in helsinki, no. it s tariffs. it s interesting because pundits have been wondering if there would be a moment and to see these republicans today saying this is a bridge too far is just noteworthy. it is noteworthy, but again your long list suggests why we should take this incident, too, with a grain of salt. listening to mitch mcconnell s remarks i m reminded of their comments during the shutdown when they were asked what the ....
Senate and democrats taking the house. i think there s revenge and resilience. for democrats, they took the house of representatives back from republican control and did it in a strong economy. okay, it shows you that on the strength of the weakness for the president among suburban voters democrats made a strong statement. the resilience piece is the president helped republicans build on their majority in the senate. he locked in a lot of his supporters on the back of his caravan message and a hard line immigration stance. kavanaugh factor was big, and united all wings of the republican party in a big way. that s a big factor. for both sides of that, remember, now you have got two years with democrats in the house in control with subpoena power, and they are going to make the president s life very ....
Nominating process and he did very poorly. he was mixed up and confused. and people that work for him, you know, a long time in the senate were not nice to him. but he was giving very confusing answers, answers that should have been easily answered and that was a rough time for him. the president saying that perhaps that difficult confirmation process was part of the reason that sessions recused himself from the russia probe. the president says one of his closest allies on his hard line immigration stance is making him unhappy at the border. that s a new criticism. he was also asked about session s future. he has yet to fire him. when he was asked, the president said we ll see what happens. though, it is clear it would be an uphill battle for this white house to confirm a new attorney general because jeff sessions is respected and defended by those on capitol hill. the next question is does he want to fire him or does he want jeff sessions to leave on his ....
Much appreciated. shannon, let s talk about the white house perspective on all of this. we already know there s a huge backlash on both sides of the aisle. you hear sarah sanders saying yesterday we re not prepared for this. we don t have the resources for it and then you hear what perry said. a bunch of kids have already been moved at least once into this facility. we don t know what s going to happen to them after 30 days and yet you hear what the president said last night which is doubling down on his hard line immigration stance. does the white house think this was a winning issue for them somehow? or is this just donald trump on his own? the president thinks this is a winning issue for him. immigration in general. he realizes these images of children being taken away from their parents and separated at the border were very damaging ....