Stay updated with breaking news from Tax argument. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
has signed up to that which is a sign of where _ has signed up to that which is a sign of where they— has signed up to that which is a sign of where they are - has signed up to that which is a sign of where they are in - has signed up to that which is a sign of where they are in termsj has signed up to that which is a i sign of where they are in terms of immigration _ sign of where they are in terms of immigration. when— sign of where they are in terms of immigration. when it _ sign of where they are in terms of immigration. when it comes- sign of where they are in terms of immigration. when it comes to i sign of where they are in terms ofl immigration. when it comes to tax cuts. _ immigration. when it comes to tax cuts. there — immigration. when it comes to tax cuts. there is— immigration. when it comes to tax cuts. there is a _ immigration. when it comes to tax cuts, there is a very— immigration. when it comes to tax cuts, there is a very strong - cuts, there is a very strong argument _ cuts, there is a very strong argument as— cuts, there is a very strong argument as to _ cuts, there is a very strong argument as to whether. cuts, there is a very strong i argument as to whether you cuts, there is a very strong - argument as to whether you should have tax— argument as to whether you should have tax cuts — argument as to whether you should have tax cuts now _ argument as to whether you should have tax cuts now or— argument as to whether you should have tax cuts now or hold - argument as to whether you should have tax cuts now or hold off. - argument as to whether you should have tax cuts now or hold off. rishij have tax cuts now or hold off. rishi sunak. _ have tax cuts now or hold off. rishi sunak. as — have tax cuts now or hold off. rishi sunak, as former— have tax cuts now or hold off. rishi sunak, as former chancellor, - have tax cuts now or hold off. rishi sunak, as former chancellor, has i sunak, as former chancellor, has been _ sunak, as former chancellor, has been putting _ sunak, as former chancellor, has been putting up— sunak, as former chancellor, has been putting up taxes _ sunak, as former chancellor, has been putting up taxes partly- sunak, as former chancellor, has been putting up taxes partly to i sunak, as former chancellor, has i been putting up taxes partly to cope with the _ been putting up taxes partly to cope with the impact— been putting up taxes partly to cope with the impact of— been putting up taxes partly to cope with the impact of covid. _ been putting up taxes partly to cope with the impact of covid. you - been putting up taxes partly to cope with the impact of covid. you are i with the impact of covid. you are saying _ with the impact of covid. you are saying we — with the impact of covid. you are saying we cannot _ with the impact of covid. you are saying we cannot do _ with the impact of covid. you are saying we cannot do tax - with the impact of covid. you are saying we cannot do tax cuts - with the impact of covid. you arel saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we _ saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we will — saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we will do _ saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we will do them _ saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we will do them in _ saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we will do them in the - saying we cannot do tax cuts now, but we will do them in the future. | but we will do them in the future. essentially— but we will do them in the future. essentially everyone _ but we will do them in the future. essentially everyone is _ but we will do them in the future. essentially everyone is getting. but we will do them in the future. i essentially everyone is getting away with saying — essentially everyone is getting away with saying we — essentially everyone is getting away with saying we want _ essentially everyone is getting away with saying we want tax _ essentially everyone is getting away with saying we want tax cuts, - essentially everyone is getting away with saying we want tax cuts, a - with saying we want tax cuts, a smaller — with saying we want tax cuts, a smaller estate, _ with saying we want tax cuts, a smaller estate, but _ with saying we want tax cuts, a smaller estate, but no- with saying we want tax cuts, a smaller estate, but no one - with saying we want tax cuts, a smaller estate, but no one is i smaller estate, but no one is defining _ smaller estate, but no one is defining what _ smaller estate, but no one is defining what is _ smaller estate, but no one is defining what is the - smaller estate, but no one is defining what is the small- smaller estate, but no one is - defining what is the small estate and want — defining what is the small estate and want to— defining what is the small estate and want to be— defining what is the small estate and want to be cut. _ defining what is the small estate and want to be cut. there - defining what is the small estate and want to be cut. there is - defining what is the small estate and want to be cut. there is this| and want to be cut. there is this really— and want to be cut. there is this really strong _ and want to be cut. there is this really strong unity. _ and want to be cut. there is this really strong unity. but - and want to be cut. there is thisj really strong unity. but different characters — really strong unity. but different characters with _ really strong unity. but different characters with each _ really strong unity. but different characters with each of - really strong unity. but different characters with each of them. i really strong unity. but different| characters with each of them. liz truss _ characters with each of them. liz truss is— characters with each of them. liz truss is a — characters with each of them. liz truss is a wannabe _ characters with each of them. liz truss is a wannabe margaret - truss is a wannabe margaret thatcher. _ truss is a wannabe margaret thatcher, who _ truss is a wannabe margaret thatcher, who for _ truss is a wannabe margaret thatcher, who for a - truss is a wannabe margaret thatcher, who for a long - truss is a wannabe margaretl thatcher, who for a long time truss is a wannabe margaret - thatcher, who for a long time has been _ thatcher, who for a long time has been cosplaying _ thatcher, who for a long time has been cosplaying her, _ thatcher, who for a long time has been cosplaying her, doing - thatcher, who for a long time has. been cosplaying her, doing pictures in tanks _ been cosplaying her, doing pictures in tanks like — been cosplaying her, doing pictures in tanks like margaret _ been cosplaying her, doing pictures in tanks like margaret thatcher - been cosplaying her, doing pictures in tanks like margaret thatcher and j in tanks like margaret thatcher and things— in tanks like margaret thatcher and things like — in tanks like margaret thatcher and things like this. _ in tanks like margaret thatcher and things like this. rishi _ in tanks like margaret thatcher and things like this. rishi sunak, - in tanks like margaret thatcher and things like this. rishi sunak, an - things like this. rishi sunak, an interesting. _ things like this. rishi sunak, an interesting, very— things like this. rishi sunak, an interesting, very smart - things like this. rishi sunak, an interesting, very smart guy, - things like this. rishi sunak, an| interesting, very smart guy, but things like this. rishi sunak, an i interesting, very smart guy, but to some _ interesting, very smart guy, but to some extent — interesting, very smart guy, but to some extent hindered _ interesting, very smart guy, but to some extent hindered by— interesting, very smart guy, but to some extent hindered by the - interesting, very smart guy, but to some extent hindered by the fact i interesting, very smart guy, but tol some extent hindered by the fact of his wifes— some extent hindered by the fact of his wife's extreme _ some extent hindered by the fact of his wife's extreme wealth. - some extent hindered by the fact of his wife's extreme wealth. he - some extent hindered by the fact of his wife's extreme wealth.— some extent hindered by the fact of his wife's extreme wealth. he kept a ureen card his wife's extreme wealth. he kept a green card that _ his wife's extreme wealth. he kept a green card that allowed _ his wife's extreme wealth. he kept a green card that allowed him - his wife's extreme wealth. he kept a green card that allowed him to - his wife's extreme wealth. he kept a green card that allowed him to work| green card that allowed him to work in america after he had become a politician and a cabinet minister. what theresa may used to call a
electorate and i think that will spill over to the party member ship as well when the vote that comes. but there is also this tax argument, so far, exchanging even as we speak, but so far a number of the prominent candidates are basically promising unfunded tax cuts. this is actually a terrible idea in the context of the economy that we are in. indeed, the economy that we are in. indeed, the former chief economist at the imf has written some papers suggesting that high debts reduces economic growth. you can imagine, if you make big tax cuts, in this context, the debt is going to go up. britain is going to have to borrow more. that could well mean you reduce growth rather than increase it. so if you are going to make tax
do they all of a sudden want to assume respond for what we're discussing? >> no, this is a gift they do not want for a number of different reasons. first of all, osceola county has some of the acreage, but almost none of the buildings. so it plays a very small role in this. orange county is about 95% of this. and they simply don't want to take over this area. disney does an excellent job. there are no potholes in disney world. their utility is among the best in the country. in fact, in 2004, when almost all of central florida lost power, disney kept going. so, they run a good operation out there. >> are the tax implications clear? because it is a partisan football now sadly. and i've heard each side try and make a tax argument as to what will happen when the dust
republicans are actually no longer even talking about raising taxes as being the central focus point of this plan because they realize, i've talked to a lot of republicans about it, that it no longer plays to talk about raising taxes. that the spending is actually the more potent political argument for republicans. so that bolsters your contention that this is actually no longer an unpopular proposition to be raising taxes on super wealthy and corporations. so that is new because for the last 20 years since you were in congress, i would say that the tax argument was a much more potent argument for republicans. >> if i were campaigning in any congressional district in any district across america, i would love my opponent, republican or democratic, to stand up and say, i don't think we should make amazon pay taxes. hey, i really don't think we should make billionaires stop being able to build up their loopholes to continue this
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20190605:11:09:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20190605:11:10:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
trump supporter for not getting the facts, then you are a hypocrite. >> look at the data in the last year. incredible data how exactly the people that donald trump promised to help, working americans, blue collar workers are benefiting. manufacturing. the best year for manufacturing job growth since 1997 before china entered the world trade organization and sucked the manufacturing jobs out. wage growth up. wage growth up for the first time in decades. that's working people and results for working real people. >> it is not fair that steve has such a great british accent. i would like to have one as well. what you're seeing if we step away from the tax argument what you're saying here with the -- the democratic party of the 1990 under bill clinton is totally over. we're seeing it back to a 1960s liberal hippie ideology that so many of us thought of. she is right to say she is
the president taking aim at the nfl. bob craft? that's his homeboy. does this make sense and is there a tax argument? >> i would have to disagree with the president in that it's very difficult to legislate supply examine demand in this particular case. as andrew suggested, you have a fixed supply of teams in all of these leagues. the fact the city wants more teams, as we saw in st. louis, of course, we felt that the pain and suffering of losing a second nfl team because there was a better offer somewhere else. at the end of the day, i don't see how you legislate that. i will point out that even though every case has to be looked at on an individual basis, there is research that a lot of teams don't generate the benefits that pay for the cost, but there is evidence that a new facility has reconstructed the downtown. >> are we going to see the boys stop kneeling?
federal government, sales tax, property tax. 60 cents of it. wait, you said that's a low rate. >> no, no, no -- what i'm saying. >> you think 60 cents out of every dollar of the government's low? >> no, what i'm saying is that argument doesn't resinate powerfully enough. what we need to do is transition to a new tax argument such as realizing the real job creators in this country are low to middle class income americans who actually buy products and services. >> look at people like rand paul who are able to energize conservatives, young people. and it's because he sticks to his values. nothing to do about don't make a tax argument. it means getting real people who are really fighting for our country. >> allison, in the back. >> honestly, we go to colleges and a generation of opportunity does the same. ours is young women for america. you're saying the same people that were recruited in a big way to vote for the president. being the ones taking the hardest hit under things like obama care. and i think it's unfortunate we
federal government, sales tax, property tax. 60 cents of it. wait, you said that's a low rate. >> no, no, no -- what i'm saying. >> you think 60 cents out of every dollar of the government's low? >> no, what i'm saying is that argument doesn't resinate powerfully enough. what we need to do is transition to a new tax argument such as realizing the real job creators in this country are low to middle class income americans who actually buy products and services. >> look at people like rand paul who are able to energize conservatives, young people. and it's because he sticks to his values. nothing to do about don't make a tax argument. it means getting real people who are really fighting for our country. >> allison, in the back. >> honestly, we go to colleges and a generation of opportunity does the same. ours is young women for america. you're saying the same people that were recruited in a big way to vote for the president. being the ones taking the hardest hit under things like obama care. and i think it's unfortunate we