Interagency Consensus News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Theres a question of what point does amending a testimony become straightup lying or perjuring one self . One said that the testimony of other witnesses helped to refresh their memories and see in new light their own experiences and will be instructive to see what volcker has to say for himself on the two key questions, quid pro quo, bribery plot, and what he was doing with Rudy Giuliani. His testimony was that he Rudy Giuliani as being a nuance and more helpful to bring Rudy Giuliani in and help him understand that he was promulgating the debunked conspiracy scenarios instead of freelance out...

Interagency consensus was in fact to provide the javelins, but they were not provided. were you aware of the decision back then? >> i was, and i think it was very much made on the political basis about concerns this would provoke the russians, depending on how this was presented. we were very mindful of that, also, when there were the discussions internally about the lethal defensive weapons inside the administration. >> mr. holmes, you are on the ground in the kyiv, and the javelins have now been authorized, provided. what is the view from the field, the u.s. embassy, as to the effectiveness ...

Them. as for evidence, we are left with is the transcript of the trump-zelensky phone call which the president made public. that means americans can read for themselves and unremarkable conversation with president zelensky who repeatedly expressed satisfaction with the call afterward. the democrats however claimed he was being bribed and therefore, he must be lying when he says the call was friendly and imposed no problem. there is some irony here. for weeks, we heard the democrats bemoaned the damage president trump supposedly caused to the u.s.-ukrainian relations. but when the ukrainian pre...

Quid pro quo. this week, bribery. who knows what ridiculous crime they will be accusing him of next week. as witnesses, the democrats have called a parade of government officials who don't like president trump's ukraine policy. even though they the knowledge he provided ukraine with lethal military aid after the obama administration refused to do so. they also resent his conduct of policy through channels outside their own authority and control. these actions they argue contradict the so-called inter-agency consensus. they don't seem to understand that the president alone is constitutionally v...

Interagency consensus. so overall, the democrats would have you believe president zelensky was blackmailed with a pause on military aid he didn't know about, that president trump didn't mention to him and that diplomats testified they always assumed would be lifted. which it was. without the ukrainian's untaking the actions they were supposedly being coerced into doing. this process is not serious, not sober. it's certainly not prayerful. it's an ambitious attack to deprive the american people of the right to elect a president the democrats don't like. as i mentioned, chairman of the committee...