KQED Charlie Rose February 16, 2016
He reoriented many peoples thinking about what the constitution means and changed the way statutes are i interpreted. Rose he appeared in 2008 and 2012. Heres excerpts from the conversations. The key conversation with the question to contexts and the Supreme Court would the American People have ratified the document if it said the application of this document and what it means shall be what the Supreme Court says it means from age to age. Nobody would have ratified that document. Its rose its a dead document to you . I like to say an enduring document. Rose but you dont say its a living docume...