I want to thank you for coming back, personnel from the break i went to welcome my panelists took thank you for being willing to participate. Obviously is the topic du jour i would say for Election Administrators as well as folks like jeremy in the Computer Science community dealing with election Cyber Security and securing the elections process. Just as a way of the background this topic is obviously the top of jews your coming out of the 2016 election where we saw a nation state state level election systems through registration as well as vendors and spear phishing attempt in 2016 as well as the declaration of election with Critical Infrastructure by the department of Homeland Security, so on this panel today i hope we delve into some of those issues and talk about the operating environment Election Officials are in today sharing expertise see all have experiences and most important what steps we are taking to secure the process when you board in 2018 and how you are moving forward p
Conversation. All right. We will go ahead and get started with the next panel. I want to thank you all for coming back first of all from the break. I want to welcome to panelists up here and thank you for willing to participate in the discussion. Obviously, it is the topic du jour for elections administrators and people in the Scientific Community dealing with election cybersecurity, and securing the election process. By way of background, this topic is obviously the topic du jour coming out of the 2016 election where we saw a nation state actors targeting state level election systems, and registration systems as well as vendors and a spearfishing attempt in 2016 as well as the declaration of the electionses as Critical Infrastructure by the department of homeland security. On this panel, i hope that we can delve into the issues and talk about the operating environment that the election official s a officials are in today, and share the expertise that you have and your experiences and
With the next panel. I want to thank you all for coming back, first of all, from the break. I want to welcome my panelists up here. Thank you for being willing to participate in this discussion. Obviously, its the topic du jour, i would say, for Election Administrators as well as folks like jeremy in the Computer Science community, dealing with election cybersecurity and securing the elections process. Just as a way of background, this topic is obviously the topic du jour coming out of the 2016 election, where we saw nation state actors targeting state level election systems or registration systems as well as vendors in a spearfishing attempt in 2016 as well as the declaration of elections as Critical Infrastructure by the department of Homeland Security. So on this panel today, i hope we can delve into some of those issues, talk about the operating environment that Election Officials are in today, share the expertise that you all have, your experiences, and most importantly, what step
Senator sessions look, its not going to be an in person entity. Proper background check. You need to be defending the peoples public safety. If you need more money to do this, you need to ask for it. If you want to rubber stamp the process, keep doing the way youre doing it. Ms. Saldana, section 1373 of title 8 of the u. S. Code provides among other things quote, a federal state, or local Government Entity or official may not prohibit or in any way restrict any Government Entity or official from sending to or receiving from i. C. E. Information regarding a citizenship or immigration status lawful or unlawful of any individual. Close quote. Dont you think that resolutions by City Councils or state governments or sheriffs in certain jurisdictions, directing their officers not to honor detainers or otherwise notify i. C. E. That they have arrested someone thats unlawfully in the country could violate or would violate section 1373 . Secretary saldana well, all of that is part of litigation
Device, restitution payments and three years of probation. Paul pelosi was not in court and chose to appear through his defense counsel. Supervised drug injection sites may not be coming to cities like San Francisco and oakland after all, governor gavin newsom rejected to bill designed attempt down on fatal overdose deaths, but as ktvu is, james torres explains, one barrier city may still move forward with launching the idea in the city anyway. In his veto letter, governor gavin newsom says he rejected the idea of launching pilot programs for supervised injection sites because without strong local leadership, it could fail and cause more trouble than its worth. I respectfully disagree with some aspects of the veto letter suggesting that either local leadership or aspects of this were not well thought out. City attorney david chu says he supports an injection site in San Francisco. And encourages any local nonprofit interested in taking on the challenge to run one to do so. Its a model