You go to safety. Youre going to buy volatility, yields, bonds, and the dollar. 10 year yield now 75 basis quite a move from just a few days ago. Crude battered, beaten up today. Less demand for those oil prices. Guy absolutely. Lets recap where we are and what is going on. The german chancellor Angela Merkel currently meeting with heads of the german states. We are going to hear from her we think when that meeting wraps. We are probably likely to hear from her as well tomorrow morning. We are also getting Emmanuel Macron a little later on. Both countries moving toward more restrict of lockdowns. Lets get the latest. Maria tadeo joins us from brussels. Theres a lot of ideas floating around. None of this will be official until both Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel speak. The idea is we are moving into something that looks like a fulltime lockdown in the case of the french government, that we understand is seriously considering a onemonth lockdown that would start thursday night, going
Generals office and i worked with the sec. Can suitably over the years and we have panel with us today and we will have Georgetown University and former director of the bureau of Consumer Protections for federal trade commission and we will have matt sheared president of the computer and the [inaudible] in here to discuss the deferment of justices proposal we have Lauren Willard who is counselor to the attorney general. We are lucky to have this great panel here and ms. Willard will walk us through that puzzle and then for offered commentary about the consumer side of things and we have [inaudible]. Again i want to give a little level set and im sure most of the people who dialed in have had familiarity with section 230 as they understand what its about but i want to give history on these things and to get context to these venues and so forth. We talked about the Communications Decency act, section 230 with the recent or fairly recent but the wolf of wall street and in particular the j
First will be taken advantage of. Our state and federal governments as well as our nations largest corporations have a responsibility to do what is right. And let me end by saying this, this virus doesnt care whether or not youre republican or whether or not youre a democrat. It should not be about party or politics. This is will health and safety of our nations food workers and our food supply. And as such, no company should be shielded from the responsibility for adopting irresponsible practices that foster the spread of this virus through their facilities. For the sake of this country that i know that we all love i urge you to Work Together to do what is right for these workers. And, again, thank you for your time and id be pleased to answer questions you may have. Thank you very much. Miss dixon. Good afternoon, chairman graham, Ranking Member feinstein and members of the committee. Im grateful for the opportunity to testify today. Im rebecca dixon, executive director of the Nation
Shielded from the responsibility for adopting irresponsible practices that fostered the spread of this virus at their facilities. For the sake of this country that i know that we all love, i urge you to Work Together to do what is right for these workers, and again, thank you for your time. I will be pleased to answer any questions you may have. Chairman thank you very much. Ms. Dixon. Afternoon,good chairman graham, Ranking Member feinstein and members of the committee. I am rebecca dixon, executive director of the National Employment law project. Nonprofit Research Policy organization that has fought to strengthen protections and build a powerful workers in the u. S. , including the unemployed. My testimony is based on policy expertise and a direct connection to frontline workers and communities. Workers held is Public Health. Workers rights to a selfie and healthy workplace must come for profits must come before. Rofits we cannot reopen businesses if workers are not safe and do not
Hes, 16, 78. Hernandez. Mr. Chief justice merkels report. When this case was spurs argue to this for two years ago. Counsel responded, and council for the United States, were both asked for the petitioners would have if Sergio Hernandez was standing on u. S. Soil when he was shot and killed by respondents . Well said yes. It wasnt for the score today, is whether in action is nonetheless foreclose. Because in this case. Sergio ascending on a few phoenix of the Mexican Border at the time he was shot. For two reasons we believe that it isnt. First. The fortuitous of where a victim is standing does not affect trigger any of the special factors. Identified by responders or the United States. Most importantly. It is difficult to see how Foreign Relations could be a special factor for including a bevin suit here. If it wouldnt have precluded acclaim if he wasnt standing just a few feet away. Moreover the governments would dramatically undermine u. S. Foreign relations in diplomacy is, belied