Stay updated with breaking news from Lisas Blatt. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
The US Supreme Court debated whether a dog toy company potentially infringed upon the trademark of Jack Daniel’s by marketing a dog toy that parodies the distiller’s product. Kentucky-based Jack Daniel’s Properties sued Phoenix-based VIP Products for creating a vinyl chew toy named Bad Spaniels that looks like Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle and with similar promotional
The Supreme Court on Thursday heard oral arguments in a case brought by Jack Daniels against the dog toy company that makes a "Bad Spaniels" parody chew toy.
Though it drew little attention when it was first passed back in 1996, a law that has been called the rule that launched big tech is now seen as a pillar of the wide-open global Internet we know today.
The case, concerning a law that gives websites immunity for suits based on their users’ posts, has the potential to alter the very structure of the internet.
SCOTUS heard oral arguments Tuesday in Gonzalez v. Google, which addresses whether Google can be held liable for content recommended by its algorithms.