Live Breaking News & Updates on Pan set out

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Pan set out on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Pan set out and stay connected to the pulse of your community

Trump Immunity Appeal

that judge pan set out, but with respect to the immunity and given the language in rose it would supply the basis for the court to apply the immunity claim. >> why aren't you taking position that we should dismiss this appeal because of the interlocutory, because it should advance your interests? >> our interests are twofold as in the united states versus nixon, it is doing justice and in the second, it is indeed to move promptly to satisfy and vindicate the public and defendant's resolution of the trial, but doing justice means to get the law right, and it is our view that even if a dismissal on the jurisdiction might move this case faster and empirically, it is hard to know, but it is not the right analysis on immunity or the second claim. >> we have a line of cases including cramer versus gates and american hospital association versus azar, and it says that we can assume

Immunity , Aren-t , Respect , Position , Appeal , Immunity-claim , Judge , Supreme-court , Language , Basis , Pan-set-out , Nixon-versus-fitzgerald

Ana Cabrera Reports

versus madison. what is your interpretation of this progeny or even the case itself? >> so, our interpretation is much closer in line with what i think heard judge pan set out and similar to yours. it does not erect an unreviewable power for the presidency. i think the prime example of that is the steel seizure case, the youngs town case. that was president truman closing the steel mills, the court coming in and reviewing that. we see that all the way through to the present. and so, it is hard to see any world in which the court just says, you know, we can't intervene here. we do see -- accept the distinction between sort of ministerial and discretionary acts, compliance with the law is not some sort of discretionary call, right? it is something that the -- i fully endorse or agree with the idea of the paradox of

Judge , Progeny , Case , Line , Interpretation , Pan-set-out , President , Steel-seizure-case , Presidency , Example , Power , Mills