Live Breaking News & Updates on Precedent

Stay informed with the latest breaking news from Precedent on our comprehensive webpage. Get up-to-the-minute updates on local events, politics, business, entertainment, and more. Our dedicated team of journalists delivers timely and reliable news, ensuring you're always in the know. Discover firsthand accounts, expert analysis, and exclusive interviews, all in one convenient destination. Don't miss a beat — visit our webpage for real-time breaking news in Precedent and stay connected to the pulse of your community

CNN News Central

decision as to whether or not to share the information normally, you would disclose that. i think one thing that prosecutors will need to keep in mind and the judge will have to accommodate as well. is the defense is going to be looking for every single potential opportunity to reserve for appeal in this particular case. and so if there's any deviation from practice or a precedent, then that is going to be an area that the defense is going to latch onto and they are going to use that in the future. so everything related to the jury selection, everything related to the introduction of evidence, all of those things the defense is going to be laser-focused on to preserve issues on appeal that makes perfect sense that the prosecution is essentially arguing that they are doing this. our understanding is because of the way that trump has posted on social media about different folks, the way that he has violated other gag orders in the past and they're concerned that it could potentially affect the case

Defense , Judge , Information , Thing , Potential , Prosecutors , Mind , Decision , One , Hush-money-case , Area , Opportunity

Anderson Cooper 360

but then iran strike back from we run to israeli territory. >> they don't want that to become the precedent that it's okay for iran to strike will deter israel to strike in damascus next time, they feel though some of the field that doesn't need to show force react with force on iranian ground. it could be what equal are the low signatures. so again, shadow war cetaceans, explosion cyber. but some israeli leaders believe it's, it will not have the same effect that would lack the public demonstration that they want. >> the radians wanted to have when they strike basically israel killed has amount the v to recreate, rewrite the rules of the games, to sell the rights you cannot continue to encourage the houthis of his valla, but they ended up with iran. now writing those, those rules in their favor i'm not sure. >> i'm not sure that they will end up winning this this round. and there was some israeli officials who told my colleague ourselves that if they would

Israeli , Strike , Iran , Doesn-t , Precedent , Territory , Force , Field , Force-react , Leaders , Ground , Demonstration

CNN This Morning

>> this impeachable was always doomed to fail if they want, they can always count on the senate democrats to do though do stuff they're going to later regret because dismissing this impeachment without having a trial, without looking at the evidence, unprecedented in the history of the senate someday in the future, they are going to regret this may not be in the next couple of years. i promise you just like they they have lived with it on judges someday in the future, they're going to regret setting a precedent of chucking an impeachment without looking at any of the evidence. >> but do you think that that warranted an impeachment? >> look, he impeachment of the cabinet member favors on what a century believe he lied to to congress about the border being secure. >> they believe he is refusing to enforce existing, you precedent. you can set a precedent in the sense that okay. now, when there's a certain party and the white house and there's a certain in party in the congress, there's just going to start impeaching cabinet members. how do you run a goal might just do that one of the political differences, one, is it a political difference to not enforce the

Trial , Impeachment , Democrats , Senate , Evidence , Impeachable , Stuff , History , Judges , Precedent , Any , Border

Alex Wagner Tonight

unfortunate precedent had been set in so doing, that the senate is effectively ignoring the will of the house. what's your reaction to that? >> well, the dangerous precedent we could have set was to legitimize and endorse this sham impeachment process. i mean those articles of impeachment are laughable on their face. there is not a sliver, there is not a hint of a high crime or mish demeanor. this is just 40 pages of complaints of what's happening at the border today. what it really stands for is a pretty simple premise. republicans do not want to fix the border. as you said in your opening they had a chance to do that. the toughest change in border law in 40 years that would have brought order to the southwest border. republicans rejected that bill because they actually want the border to be out of control. what they want is for there to be headlines every day about how chaotic the border is so they can score political points and

Senate , House-of-representatives , Set , Reaction , Precedent , Sham-impeachment-process , Doing , Will , Impeachment , Crime , Articles , Hint

BBC News

of impeachment that alleged mayorkas mismanaged the us southern border, wilfully refusing to comply with the law and breached public trust. in february, mayorkas became the first cabinet secretary to be impeached in nearly 150 years. democrats have condemned house republicans, saying the procedure was used to solve policy disagreements. republican senate minority leader mitch mcconnell warned of the potential ramifications from dismissing the charges so quickly. we've set a very unfortunate precedent here. this means that the senate can ignore, in effect, the house's impeachment. it doesn't make any difference whether our friends on the other side thought he should have been impeached or not. he was. live now to luke broadwater, a congressional correspondent for the new york times. this was a trial that was

Impeachment , Alejandro-mayorkas , Us , Democrats , Cabinet-secretary , Law , Southern-border , Public-trust , 150 , Senate , Republican , Charges

The Source With Kaitlan Collins

liters now worried the tide shifting dramatically, perhaps in russia's favor. a lot to discuss with david sanger, the white house and national security correspondent for the new york times, his new book new cold war's is out now. sanger has covered five presidents, starting with bill clinton in the book, describes how a fundamental misunderstanding of countries like russia and china influenced us policy. for instance, saying he writes, quote, each precedent claim to yet achieved meaningful progress toward integrating america's adversaries into a world order. washington had created and nurtured for 75 years each new bond assign the world's most powerful nations were rolling together they were not david sanger, grateful for your time tonight let me just start. i think one of the most provocative things is just the title, not new cold war, but plural, new cold war's the mess is everywhere well that's right john. and what i want to try to make clear from that title is that the old cold war was sort of a singular event between the

Lot , Book , Cold-war , Favor , David-sanger , New-york-times , Security , Correspondent , White-house , Tide , Russian , Five

All In With Chris Hayes

>> i was out there supporting the protest. and i was actually arrested pretty quickly. it was the photo that you had up. so i was in jail for 17 hours, so i was as shocked as anybody to get charge with this, but i was actually sued by five police officers. we got them all dismissed, including this one. they appealed, and then we lost an appeal. so i've been dealing with this loss and appeal since 2016. >> and i just want to be really clear, because there's some pretty firm precedent, right? like, it cannot be the case you could have a functioning first amendment with the right to peaceably assemble and the right to have protests if any police officer who happens to be injured by one person at that protest could then say that this other person is civilly liable for that injury, which is the theory of this police officer, in which the supreme court has president has said, no, that it doesn't work that way. >> there's a historic case naacp versus claiborne that says that you can't sue a purpose organizer if somebody else just commits an act of violence or destruction. what is wild about my case,

Protest , Charge , Photo , Jail , Anybody , 17 , District-court-case , One , Precedent , Amendment , Appeal , Police-officers

All In With Chris Hayes

about the precedent as a member of the house, this is a violation of institutional forms what is your response to that? >> that is hilarious. , they have been broken by house republicans over and over and over again. the norm is trying to impeach a secretary for actually doing nothing. there are no high crimes. no links to any wrong doing. so this idea we are somehow breaking a norm here. i mean, they are the shatter norms every single day. this is about all the distraction they are doing. >> i wanted to get your

Precedent , House , Response , Violation , Member , Forms , Crimes , Norm , Nothing , Secretary , House-republicans , Doing

Deadline White House

is a former criminal defense attorney, and what he will tell you is if your client has neither the law on their side nor the facts on their side, the only strategy left to you is to attack the system itself, to attack the entire thing, and i think what we should expect from trump during this trial and any of the other trials that proceed is exactly that behavior, and you just alluded to how he did it to muller, and he did it to comey. when the facts of the law are not on one's side, you attack the system, and there is a very frightening precedent for that to your question about what the future holds. roughly 100 years ago, kind of almost to the week, another demagogue who had attempted to overthrow their government in 1923 in munich was put on trial for that attempted insurrection, and that demagogue used that trial to put the entire national government on trial and sow doubt in the government, and that doubt they sowed later led

System , Thing , New-york-state-law , Facts , Side , Strategy , Client , Criminal-defense-attorney , Itself , Paul-manafort-criminal-trial , Trump , One

Way Too Early With Jonathan Lemire

>> we felt very strongly that we had to set a precedent that impeachment should never be used to settle policy disagreements. if we allowed that to happen, it would set a disastrous precedent for congress, could throw our system of checks and balances into cycles of chaos. any time the house would want to just shut the senate down, they could send over another impeachment resolution and could create frivolous -- frivolous impeachment trial after impeachment trial. >> meanwhile, back to the house side of the bill, a shouting match broke out during a house oversight committee hearing yesterday when chairman james comer and ranking member jamie raskin got into an argument about the republican led effort to impeach president biden. look at that. >> what business were the bidens in? what business did joe biden's family own?

Impeachment , Precedent , Policy-disagreements , House , Senate , Chaos , United-states-congress , Checks , System , Balances , Cycles , Down