Page 7 - Process Crime News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

including some marked as top secret, and meant to be only available in special government facilities. a list of items removed from the property shows fbi agents took around 20 boxes of items as well as binders of photos, at least one handwritten note and a document about pardoning trump's ally, roger stone. also included was information about the president of france, according to the three-page list. that list contained in a seven-page document also includes the warrant to search the premise which was granted by a federal magistrate judge in florida. the list includes references to o...

join us more on the predawn raids and in this case in his home with fake new cnn cameras, how did they get tipped off? the latest details from america's partisan two-tiered system of justice. ♪ ♪ cannot we begin with a fox news alert breaking right now one individual with access to the fbi's search warrant used at mar-a-lago is revealing new details about the document. tonight we can exclusively report that the warrant identified two very vague categories of interest. one document said should or could be in the national archives and two anything else that may be marked classified...

saying he declassified all those documents. in reaction and a second let's go to david spunt, there is a lot of new since then. >> a lot of news and we've been on tv and we will continue to do so. check with the department of justice, no further comment from the doj after merrick garland's comments were he announced he was behind an order of the application the search warrant in mar-a-lago. this is the search and seizure warrant released today and the federal search and seizure warrant for mar-a-lago. i want to put up a graphic that shows you some of the highlights of what was confis...

To declassify the documents or take them with him. if he really thought that, why would he ask someone to delete security footage. >> yeah, but the whole thing. if he really thought he had the right to have the documents, there were umpteen ways for him to assert that when he was asked by the government and during that 1 1/2-year period. he never did. he never asserted it in a lawful way. what did he do? he obstructed the subpoena, both subpoenas. >> you said before that at its core this is an obstruction case because he gave the documents back, he would have never been indicted. but what do y...

>> he says he had a right to declassify the document, or take them with them. if he thought that, why would he ask someone to delete security surveillance footage? >> the whole thing, if he thought he had the right to have that documents, they were umpteen ways for him to assert that when he was asked by the government, during that one and a half year period. he never did. he never asserted it in a lawful way. what did he do? he obstructed the subpoena, and both subpoenas. >> you have said before, at its core, this is an obstruction case, because you say he gave the documents back. he would ha...