Stay updated with breaking news from Rehashing. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Interactions with teresa. saying, there is no proof mister avery was becoming obsessed with mrs. halbach. and that rehashing a story about it admissible evidence seems pointless. still there also notes, mr. cross has no qualifications which would allow him to diagnose mr. avery as a psychopath. mr. avery has never been diagnosed as a psychopath. kratz, who prosecuted both steven avery and brendan ducey says he s undaunted. are you afraid of kathleen s owner? no. i m not in the case anymore. should be afraid of anything. my involvement concluded she could unravel your work if what she is saying has some weight to it. you don t think she is a chance? i don t. she s a competent, why are you confident? we spent 18 months putting this case together. this wasn t just thrown together. it wasn t crystal cops. it was done very professionally, very well. ....
Possibly some who would have some reservations about donald trump in terms of the legal challenges he s faced already, and could there be more to come. i think, it s getting to that second place behind trump. if for any legal reason he suddenly imploded, you want to be in that second place and if they don t think ron desantis is making headway, maybe that s what they re aiming for rather than trump himself. interesting. and what would be interested now, stephanie, in the months ahead? because this was dominant so much media coverage in the mateta. what would be interesting is that during the debates and tv adverts, there will be a lots of rehashing, obviously, of the donald trump era which many republicans who supported trump would be very pleased about. they liked the drama and upset in the lots of people, in their eyes, assist in the right people, but there are lots of republicans and ....
How unusual is it to spend six years excuse me, four years, $6 million and not recommend any indictments? not recommending any indictments, there s nothing there s no there there. that s actually the responsible thing to do. the question i have is, why it took so long. the actual investigation took half the amount of time in terms of what the fbi did and then the mueller investigation was half the amount of time that was taken by john durham. in terms of what he found, there really is nothing new in this report. there s a lot of rehashing of the two trials that he lost where i think it was really poor form for him to basically say, i disagree with the finding of 24 ....
Department of justice under donald trump, the ig there launched his own investigation and said, yes, there were flaws in the way the fbi went about this, but the investigation itself was, in fact, justified. the fbi made changes after that. when this report came out yesterday, the fbi said, yeah, we know all that. everything you put in this report is out there, and that s why we made these changes a couple of years ago. yes, it is sort of a rehashing. i guess john durham had to produce something after spending four years on this. it turns out not to be much of anything, really. nbc news justice and intelligence correspondent ken dilanian has been following this from the beginning. so, ken, as you sort of turn through the pages, 306 of them, of this, what did you see inside? any new revelations? any bombshells to your reading? willie, there was some new information, really only meaningful for us who are following every little twist and turn of this. but the thing that was most remarka ....
Significance you have. but if you understand the significance of you have. but if you understand the significance of these, you have. but if you understand the significance of these, as you have. but if you understand the significance of these, as i you have. but if you understand the significance of these, as i say, - you have. but if you understand the significance of these, as i say, it. significance of these, as i say, it is part significance of these, as i say, it is part of significance of these, as i say, it is part of a significance of these, as i say, it is part of a historic significance of these, as i say, it is part of a historic ceremony- significance of these, as i say, it. is part of a historic ceremony that has developed is part of a historic ceremony that has developed over is part of a historic ceremony that has developed over 1000 - is part of a historic ceremony that has developed over 1000 years, i is part of a historic ceremony that i has develope ....