Live Breaking News & Updates on Restrictions on the
Stay updated with breaking news from Restrictions on the. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
♪ >> bret: new filings indicate missouri democratic congresswoman cori bush paid her husband another $15,000 from her candidate committee this year. that happened despite an ongoing justice department probe into her campaign spending. the congresswoman has paid her spouse $135,000 for security services since january of 2022. her campaign office is not commenting weaknesses in chip stocks led to mixed results on wall street today. the dow gained 211. the s&p 500 was down 44. the nasdaq was off 319. for the week, the dow was up a fraction. the s&p 500 dropped 3 percentage points. the nasdaq fell 5.5. the biden administration is taking steps to limit oil and gas drilling and mining in alaska. the new regulation blocks development on 40% of alaska's national petroleum preserve to protect habitats for polar bears, caribou and other wildlife. state officials say the restrictions will cost jobs and
threat of further escalation between iran and israel, saying there at the start of his comments that this is a moment of maximum peril in the middle east, it must be a time for maximum restraint. he then went on to talk about the offensive in gaza creating a humanitarian health scape, his description, saying they needed a quantum leap in aid being delivered, saying that though although there was progress by israel improve deliveries in gaza it is often cancelled out by delays and restrictions elsewhere. some of the key lines from antonio guterres. also as we were listening to that, let me just update you from the uk and the us news that the uk has sanctioned a further seven individuals and six entities who have enabled iran to conduct destabilising regional activity, including the direct attack on israel. that coming from the uk authorities. it is in coordination with the us are taking similar moves. that is the backdrop, so
this case, she said she was afraid and intimidated by the press. so that's the lay of the land. the judge has now tightened restrictions even further on different things that the press can report about prospective jurors. again, the fact that a member of the media, in that case a fox news anchor, used that information the way he chose to doesn't resolve the tougher questions here because you can restrict certain information in the court certainly for safety, certainly for the jurors anonymity, but this is going to be a freewheeling debate and people will say what they want about the trial. there has to be first amendment rights in this trial. so that's what the judge said. i told you the other thing, prosecutors also allege that donald trump has been violating his gag order. that came up earlier this week. they now cite seven other instances, including trump posting online with a quote from that fox host i just showed you
opportunities for action. finally, we will propose the establishment of the four— we will propose the establishment of the four nations climate response group _ the four nations climate response group. including, financing, and the balance _ group. including, financing, and the balance of— group. including, financing, and the balance of devolved powers. these policies _ balance of devolved powers. these policies sit — balance of devolved powers. these policies sit alongside intensive ongoing — policies sit alongside intensive ongoing work and will be bolton through— ongoing work and will be bolton through our next climate change plan and our— through our next climate change plan and our green industrial strategy. but this— and our green industrial strategy. but this ambitious new package, allow— but this ambitious new package, allow there to be no doubt about the seriousness with which this government treats the climate and nature _ government treats the climate and nature crisis. and our readiness to act to— nature crisis. and our readiness to act to deliver. we must also acknowledge that we do so in difficult — acknowledge that we do so in difficult circumstances. the climate change _ difficult circumstances. the climate change committee is clear that the uk is _ change committee is clear that the uk is already substantially of track for 2030 _ uk is already substantially of track for 2030 and achieving feature uk carbon _ for 2030 and achieving feature uk carbon budgets will require sustained increase in the piece that pace of— sustained increase in the piece that pace of decarbonisation in the range of most _ pace of decarbonisation in the range of most sectors. we do see severe budgetary— of most sectors. we do see severe budgetary restrictions imposed by the uk _
the 2045 goal the legally binding one instead of 2030. so she was also setting out a package of measures there to try to reach that goal, that included trying to quadruple electric charge points for cars in scotland by 2030 and national integrated ticketing system across scotland's transportation system and aiming further reduction in car use as well. trying to take people along with you in those old fossil fuel industries. of course, the cabinet secretary was attempting maybe to pin the blame on westminster. she was saying they were doing this under difficult circumstances, that the uk government was backtracking on climate change. they were trying to transition with one hand tied behind their back. there were these budgetary restrictions to it, she
with some of the other jurors and the court's going to have to figure out a way to not just lose this entire jury one-by-one, or to have this whole process go off the rails? >> elie, how would the judge do that? it wouldn't be something like having the attorneys would it be possible for the attorneys to be able to know this information, but not put it out in open court. i mean, how would the judge go about doing this as each of the jurors are asked questions about their backgrounds, who they are, what businesses they're in but, they do. and if they have children, there are all these questions that that of course the attorneys want to know right? >> so a lot of the information is already out there as to the what was seven and our six jurors on this panel, the judges only real option here is to place restrictions on access to the information the attorney her knees have to know all this information. you can't keep it away from the attorneys. but really to limit access beyond that. now, if a judge is going to start doing that, holding some of these conversations,
company. so i think i'm feeling good about this vote as well congressman, i want to zero in on the portion that entails aid to israel. >> obviously, we haven't seen the text of the bill or the details therein and how is finalized what i'm curious about potential restrictions to aid predicated on the we're that israel handles the war in gaza. there's been a lot of criticism even from the president himself over recent developments in gaza based on the idf's handling of aden workers, for instance, and accidental strike against world central kitchen aid workers do you think that something needs to be in the bill that acts, as a kind of restriction to ensure that the idf is following international law, or at least a mechanism to have the united states observe that aspect of the war more critically well, one thing that the white house did before these bills were
budgetary restrictions imposed by the uk meant an under the continuing constraints _ the uk meant an under the continuing constraints of devolution, we are trying _ constraints of devolution, we are trying to— constraints of devolution, we are trying to achieve societal and economic— trying to achieve societal and economic transformation with one hand _ economic transformation with one hand tied — economic transformation with one hand tied behind our back. such as the uk's _ hand tied behind our back. such as the uk's unprecedented economic mismanagement but for delivery of our plans— mismanagement but for delivery of our plans will be contingent on the uk government reversing the 9% cut to the _ uk government reversing the 9% cut to the capital budget. this government and parliament rightly have high— government and parliament rightly have high ambitions and it is beyond doubt _ have high ambitions and it is beyond doubt that— have high ambitions and it is beyond doubt that investing our net zero is i’ili'it doubt that investing our net zero is right thing — doubt that investing our net zero is right thing for our environment, our society— right thing for our environment, our society and — right thing for our environment, our society and economy. but we are being _ society and economy. but we are being held — society and economy. but we are being held back sol society and economy. but we are being held back so i am asking msps from across— being held back so i am asking msps from across the chamber to work with us to court— from across the chamber to work with us to court in— from across the chamber to work with us to court in the uk government to reverse _ us to court in the uk government to reverse scotland's capital cut. whilst — reverse scotland's capital cut. whilst the opposition quite rightly demand _ whilst the opposition quite rightly demand that the scottish government to take _ demand that the scottish government to take urgent action to address the climate _ to take urgent action to address the climate crisis, if they are serious about— climate crisis, if they are serious about this — climate crisis, if they are serious about this challenge, they must now stand _ about this challenge, they must now stand with _ about this challenge, they must now stand with us in support of the day's — stand with us in support of the day's policy package and the remainder of the work that we are
saying that liberal activists were also somehow lying to get on the jury. now trump is using fox in a dance to try to get away with saying things. let me be clear, trump the defendant, is not like just some freewheeling member of the press, he already has restrictions, including a gag order. so it's very different when he does things about the jury or witnesses than others. for example, on this program we are going to discuss and even at times fact check the witnesses. we can do that. the defendant can't. the prosecutor said that post i'm leaving up on the screen was the most disturbing post, especially in light of what happened this morning. trump's defense lawyers say, quote, none of that establish that there is a willful violation. in fact, it brings to light some of the ak big guts of the gag order that i mentioned. here's what the gag order states. the deft, trump, is directed to refrain from making or directing others to make public statements
funding israel, which i support but we're also funding israel's enemies and funding hamas. this is the kind of duplicitous crap the american people retired up. so i'd like to go back to the drawing board, pass israel, stand alone and not have this package that has that funding and it that i think is nefarious and focus on the border first. so in terms of the border issue i asked him a lot of house republicans wants to have strengthening the border, tougher restrictions on the border and immigration, et cetera. as part of this, why isn't it part of it? and he said it's very simple. >> i have slanderous majority in the history of the congress. >> i i can only lose one vote. and therefore because there are so many republicans who will vote against the rule to introduce this legislation that he would need democratic votes to interest produce the rule to allow the votes on this legislation. and democrats won't have, they won't vote for anything that includes the immigration stuff that's why