Stay updated with breaking news from Skip it. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
it's meaningless. in other words he'll sign it -- just because donald trump doesn't keep his pledges either, his words. last night the former president explained why he might skip the debate altogether. >> why would i sign a pledge if there are people i wouldn't have? i can name three or four people that i wouldn't support for president. asa hutchinson who's polling at zero will ask nasty questions. somebody like chris christie, polling at 1% and will ask me nasty questions. i've gotten good marks on debating talents. >> joining me, brandon buck, former top communications adviser to speakers ryan and boehner, and the romney presidential campaign in 2012, and former obama white house press secretary robert gibbs. so brendan, the republican chair is not budging on the pledge. do you think donald trump's going skip it? if so, won't ron desantis then as the runner-up automatically become the target of everybody elms's attacks?
a cause of terri sanderson's harm? r' , , a cause of terri sanderson's harm? w , , ., harm? oh, skip it. there is no resnonse _ harm? oh, skip it. there is no response there. _ harm? oh, skip it. there is no response there. -- _ harm? oh, skip it. there is no response there. -- terry. - harm? oh, skip it. there is noj response there. -- terry. was terry sanderson _ response there. -- terry. was terry sanderson at _ response there. -- terry. was terry sanderson at fault? - response there. -- terry. wasj terry sanderson at fault? yes. was terry sanderson's fault a cause gwyneth paltrow�*s... did terry sanderson's fault because gwyneth paltrow�*s harm? yes. comparative fault. what % of the fault you assigned to terry sanderson? 100%. damages. what amount fairly compensates gwyneth paltrow for economic damages? $1. 0ur correspondent sophie long was at the court for the verdict. earlier high asked her the significance of what has happened. significance of what has happened-— significance of what has happened. significance of what has hauened. ~ �*, , ., happened. well, there's been a hue happened. well, there's been a huge amount — happened. well, there's been a huge amount of— happened. well, there's been a huge amount of interest - happened. well, there's been a huge amount of interest in - happened. well, there's been a huge amount of interest in this| huge amount of interest in this trial, of course, and it lasted
adjudicate in the court, but it's one reason why the politicians in congress might say skip it. and what does it tell you that the republicans who support trump don't want to give a speech this weekend? >> that's a great question, ari. what a lot of people do who are running for office focus on the question, what's my path to victory? and by path to victory, people mean, who are my likely voters? who are likely to be my base. one signal i think it sends is a lot of these folks don't think it's their base. maybe it's a base. i think we've seen from a ron desantis, a base he's trying to wink but nonetheless may not be his starting point base, and i think some of that footage you showed about the popularity of donald trump amongst some republicans -- we know from polling that's roughly a third of republican who is really self-identify as trump republicans as opposed to
what is the terrible truth about the last few months, even though the government wish it were not so, is britain got a bit of a knock to its reputation from what happened last autumn. i promise you, global boardrooms noticed. i am telling you they have voted with their feet. not for ever, not for ever, but a lot have turned round and said, i don't know what is going on in britain right now, i mightjust skip it for a second. we will eminently bring that back, and i think the prime minister and the chancellor are doing a very good job on steadying the ship and having a more stable economy. so much has happened, people might not instantly say, last autumn, you mean the toppling of borisjohnson and the liz truss budget, the toppling of truss and the installation of another prime minister? yes, this has been happening whilest a bif thing has been a big thing has been happening in the word,
danker dampener and it was a proper slap on the wrist? let danker dampener and it was a proper slap on the wrist?— slap on the wrist? let me have a chat about _ slap on the wrist? let me have a chat about it, _ slap on the wrist? let me have a chat about it, because _ slap on the wrist? let me have a chat about it, because i - slap on the wrist? let me have a chat about it, because i had - slap on the wrist? let me have a chat about it, because i had a i slap on the wrist? let me have a i chat about it, because i had a long chat about it, because i had a long chat to people about it. i spend every week in this job talking to a global chief executive about britain. what is the terrible truth about the last few months, even though the government wish it were not so, britain got a bit of a knock to its reputation from what happened last autumn. i promise you, global boardrooms notice. i am telling you they have voted with their feet. not for ever, not for ever but a lot have turned round and said, i don't know what is going on in britain right now, i mightjust skip it for a second. we will eminently bring that back and i think the prime minister and the chancellor are doing a very good job in studying the ship and improving the economy. so much has happened, people might
eat? i did earl y too.m not hungry i don't like to eat late. i'm not hungry late at night. i just assume. >> skip it. i haven't eaten late. okay, no circadian rhythm. i'm a weekend morning show. oh yeah. yeah. so mornings i eat at four mothers at eighty . >> it's all over the map. you're on time to get three this morning. >> i saw her although bright and early this morning i was up at four. that's because you guys slept together. oh, and finally, here's a shocker. new york city isn't the mouth capital of the country. columbuscapital of', ohio ranksr one for swearings in vegas is second. the third is jacksonville for that fell. and , well, you you've seen their football team. >> that's that's it.t's it jessie , each of, these has anl do except explanation. yeah. what do you think? it to me, they all do, except for columbus. jacksonville. >> come on , jags.be right. what was number two?r two, it has an explanation. . thcan't. that is it? losing money all the time. that one's self explanatory. that's why i love columbus,t abu ohio. t combus ohiwe're saying this i. i have no idea. use but, you know, they used to
♪♪ >> last but not least, snoop dogg giving nursery rhymes a try. called "doggie land" on youtube, a cast of dogs led by bow whistle, voiced by snoop. i'm always looking for new shows, check it out? >> skip it. how we went from mr. rogers to snoop dogg i'll never know. this is -- what is it called, doggie land, not style, but it's not exactly paw patrol. animation is a little stiff, it's a positive message and i guess, look, if snoop dogg is not smoking a blunt and mock
lesser charges. you really have to understand this, okay? once you decide the question as a jury of whether or not kyle rittenhouse reasonably used deadly force to defend himself, once you answer that question yes, he did, the charges are irrelevant. they are irrelevant because he is justified under the law in whatever the charges were. you see what i'm saying? the jury didn't skip it. they obviously looked at the charges, right? they came out. they asked the question, they wanted to watch the video, but you have to understand that part legally. it has nothing to do with politics. it has nothing to do with the jury. nothing. once they decided he was justified in using deadly force to defend himself, it was reasonable or whatever they feel, the charges go away. he's justified: it's an important point. now, we have his lawyer here
lesser charges. you really have to understand this, okay? once you decide the question as a jury of whether or not kyle rittenhouse reasonably used deadly force to defend himself, once you answer that question yes, he did, the charges are irrelevant. they are irrelevant because he is justified under the law in whatever the charges were. you see what i'm saying? the jury didn't skip it. they obviously looked at the charges, right? they came out. they asked the question, they wanted to watch the video, but you have to understand that part legally. it has nothing to do with politics. it has nothing to do with the jury. nothing. once they decided he was justified in using deadly force to defend himself, it was
Tucker Carlson Tonight-20200926-00:52:45 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.