Stay updated with breaking news from Superclear. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
that all said, i think most of us have been expecting a relatively quick decline. obviously hoping that we'll see a relatively quick decline. that's what we're seeing in new york city as you reported. we're seeing that in washington, d.c. i'm hopeful this wastewater data is more evidence that we're going to see it in boston and obviously we're going to want to see it across the country. >> as we see it in new york city, as we see it in boston, as we see it in d.c., those are three cities. we have yet to see superclear evidence, at least definitive evidence that this is happening on a scale large enough for it to be identified in an individual state. but if we get to the point where we start to see this as the pattern, should communities and states that are further down the timeline in terms of when omicron started to crash over them, should they use that data in terms of planning for the kinds of mitigation efforts they can make to take care of their staff, to keep their hospitals from crashing, to try to keep the hospital system and the health care system running as the -- as the brunt of the wave hits them?
potential reforms to the way the supreme court operates and the way it's constituted ought to be seriously considered because of the way that republicans in particular have really stacked the deck to make that court their own play thing. president biden formed a court commission to study the matter and as you say, you know, somewhat facetiously, we can't wait for them to hear they ought to do something different in 27 years. if you could wave a magic wand and be the new convener of the court commission, what would you have them do? >> rachel, i want to be superclear. i have so much respect for so many of the people on that commission. the time to fix the courts was yesterday, if not ten years ago. i just think that having a court commission that is not by the way seriously looking at court expansion, that is doing a kind of quasi-academic exercise trying to think about other versions of structural court reform, i just think the urgency that we are facing in terms of what this court can do and will do, not just in terms of
is how sensitive it is. if you talk to scientists, they will say politicians have to get round this, they don't say meat or dairy or fish has to be banned. but they could at least set an example and... it would be a good idea to eat less. dr michal. i wonder if i could ask you a general question, what did you make of what was discussed and presented today at that conference? what we hear today from the ipcc which _ what we hear today from the ipcc which is _ what we hear today from the ipcc which is a — what we hear today from the ipcc which is a report commissioned by the world — which is a report commissioned by the world governments, so this is notjust— the world governments, so this is notjust a — the world governments, so this is notjust a science the world governments, so this is not just a science telling the world governments, so this is notjust a science telling us the world governments, so this is not just a science telling us what you do. — not just a science telling us what you do, this is governments asking us what _ you do, this is governments asking us what we — you do, this is governments asking us what we should do, and the report is superciear— us what we should do, and the report is superclear that climate change is happening — is superclear that climate change is happening now, fast and faster than we thought. what that means is even it may— we thought. what that means is even it may have _ we thought. what that means is even it may have been weird to admit you are a _ it may have been weird to admit you are a vegetarian a few years ago, these _ are a vegetarian a few years ago, these changes are necessary, these
you recognize all water is recycled, we're giving away the most precious resource, when we're sitting on a gold mine right here. >> reporter: want to be superclear. the mayor of los angeles is saying, by 2035, the 4 million residents of this city, hopefully will be drinking this stuff, that started hours ago in our homes and showers and toilets? >> absolutely. you'll have the sweetest, cleanest, clearest water and right here from l.a. >> reporter: already los angeles has one small facility on purif water to the point that people can drink it. the water doesn't get piped back to homes. the plant goes through the steps that tillman and hyperion do and adds more at the end.e osmosis. and the final stage of the process, that treats the water with ultraviolet light. this is the equivalent of the most extreme tanning bed for water. >> exactly.
institutions knowing that is not part of the package. >> you're right, martha. let's be superclear. there is exemption for religious institutions for a primary relidge just purpose. churches would not be forced to provide contraception. this is very narrow ruling to laws already in place. if you are an institution that yes, a religious bent to it but whose primary purpose is nonreligion, talking universities and hospitals primarily and you provide pharmaceutical coverage to your employees you have to provide contraception. martha: they are not going for that. >> due paul university, largest catholic university in the country, years ago added contraception coverage. martha: we don't know what the white house will say what the accommodation is? do you think it will go far enough to appease this controversy? >> it has to. it has to deescalate what the president brought on himself. this is another instance ruling out of ideology instead of reality. taking on a super pac if