Tomorrow, the british Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer, Will Travel To Washington to discuss it with him. Lets talk about the decision because the calibration have to because the calibration have to be very careful. Time is of Course Tort because we have a us election upon us and we are what Donald Trump said on tuesday not when asked whether he wanted ukraine to win. What do you Thinkjoe Biden will be thinking about when he meets Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow . Is Sir Keir Starmer tomorrow . Is possible we might see the us not objecting to the uk sitting its long Range Storm Shadow missiles its long Range Storm Shadow missiles and the french version as Well Missiles and the french version as well to missiles and the french version as well to at least allow the ukrainians to send those type of weapons further and deeper into russian territory, but of course into russian territory, but of course they cannot go as deep as the course they cannot go as deep as the us course they cannot go as d
have been living in a nightmare for a while, this is the beginning of a new national nightmare. it is astounding. if you go back to that place in time and try to figure out why they were doing what they were doing, there is that narrative that maybe the president thought that he s going to win so he continues with this business dealings and trying to set himself up. this tracks that view, now after he s elected, what does he do? we got to lie about him and cover him up. even if he did not think he was going to win. that does not make it right. it does not make it right. we are dealing with people that are not dealt in the realm of legality. it explains of the thought pattern of what went through their minds after the election. i will get it in. the president s action is really very, very similar to the way organized crime bosses behaved.
aggressive tone. they are playing with fire as jeff flake sort of suggested there. the overwhelming evidence is that the public would react very badly to the firing of mueller. those risk getting themselves caught in any kind of back lash. it is kind of tough to follow either the white house or president s thought pattern about the fbi and how to go forward because there was at least one member of the white house not long ago saying you don t mess with the fbi. now white house press secretary tweeted that when you are attacking fbi agents because you are under criminal investigation you are losing. what has changed potentially? in terms of president trump s m.o., nothing has changed. he will say and do anything that he thinks gives him an advantage at the moment he feels like it via twitter or some comment that he makes off the cuff. what you are seeing here is an attempt to erode the credibility
elections. this is a threat to the very democracy that we have here in america and around the world. and i would hope that our president will say something, but i have no confidence that he will. let s turn to north korea now, the president in the rose garden with the president of south korea, talked about strategic patience with north korea. and here s what he said. the era of strategic patience with the north korean regime has failed. many years, and it s failed. and frankly, that patience is over. now, the first time we ve heard this from this administration clearly a rhetorical shift from the obama administration. practically, what does that mean? what does the end of strategic patience look like from your perspective? i was going to ask you because i have no clue what that means. listen, clearly, it s a difficult situation in north korea. my thought pattern would be that we ve got to be in lockstep with
people who at times may be against them and may be forced to be alongside them. if you bomb them, maybe increasingly close to their point of view, how do you strike that cautious balance and militarily effective. a vitally important part where isis is. it has a lot of military power that they are trying to gather to its north through kurdish forces and weak syrian sunni arab coalition, the syrian democratic face. they want to use special forces to mobilize them to move south towards raqqa. it s not imminent but the idea of france saying raqqa is our target now, that may potentially focus nato minds, barack obama too, involved in this thought pattern as well, may involve people to think slightly more about what happens next on a border military front. if this is the beginning, what is next for france? is this a ground troop situation and what is next for the united