women's rights advocates are gathered in support of peggy young, the u.p.s. driver who sued for pregnancy discrimination. what we'll be looking at is how do the justices see this case? is this the chance for them to break their streak of restricting women's rights that rule in favor of plaintiffs that seek to limit it, or is this an opportunity, they see this impinges on the rights of ememployer ememployers, something the court is very sympathetic to. >> it is illegal to fire someone because they're a woman, but what exactly is she saying should have happened? >> well when you say the major functions of the job, what peggy young argues in fact this was only a very small portion of her work responsibilities as a u.p.s. driver that she couldn't perform without assistance. she couldn't lift packages that were more than 20 pounds. in other cases, maybe women need